Re: [multipathtcp] towards a potential work item on two-ended proxy

"Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE)" <wim.henderickx@nokia.com> Tue, 02 August 2016 17:54 UTC

Return-Path: <wim.henderickx@nokia.com>
X-Original-To: multipathtcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: multipathtcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABEB412D79F for <multipathtcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 10:54:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wg4qmAz1phRj for <multipathtcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 10:54:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp-fr.alcatel-lucent.com (fr-hpida-esg-02.alcatel-lucent.com [135.245.210.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 082FB12D18B for <multipathtcp@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 10:54:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fr712umx4.dmz.alcatel-lucent.com (unknown [135.245.210.45]) by Websense Email Security Gateway with ESMTPS id 0EDC0A692CD65; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 17:54:18 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from fr712usmtp2.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (fr712usmtp2.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com [135.239.2.42]) by fr712umx4.dmz.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO-o) with ESMTP id u72HsJ75016640 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 2 Aug 2016 17:54:20 GMT
Received: from FR711WXCHHUB01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (fr711wxchhub01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com [135.239.2.111]) by fr712usmtp2.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id u72Hi8MN008331 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 2 Aug 2016 19:54:10 +0200
Received: from FR711WXCHMBA07.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([169.254.3.82]) by FR711WXCHHUB01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.239.2.111]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Tue, 2 Aug 2016 19:48:56 +0200
From: "Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE)" <wim.henderickx@nokia.com>
To: "philip.eardley@bt.com" <philip.eardley@bt.com>, "multipathtcp@ietf.org" <multipathtcp@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [multipathtcp] towards a potential work item on two-ended proxy
Thread-Index: AQHR7DWI+H5KVobs2E61DPJLQEiUPaA1odiAgABSA4A=
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2016 17:48:56 +0000
Message-ID: <07C3A957-7706-4A26-9D7B-864C6B93D157@nokia.com>
References: <b779dd12f1bb412c96c800eddaaf0247@rew09926dag03b.domain1.systemhost.net> <e2aa6ac517194af4b8c25c07f8e469fb@rew09926dag03b.domain1.systemhost.net> <9cafc779-502e-cc7f-676c-f6659e207c81@uclouvain.be> <5fadd9cfcc01401b84db03052e165c69@rew09926dag03b.domain1.systemhost.net> <D3994CAB-846A-4418-A399-C48D196717A3@nokia.com> <1612497ced7e4f288781dfd89ff1e6cf@rew09926dag03b.domain1.systemhost.net>
In-Reply-To: <1612497ced7e4f288781dfd89ff1e6cf@rew09926dag03b.domain1.systemhost.net>
Accept-Language: nl-BE, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/0.0.0.151008
x-originating-ip: [135.239.27.40]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <B26D10DE8F5B9E4CBC449D59D2D838B5@exchange.lucent.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/multipathtcp/9yS3Jfe0P_fi0ZfQERg80LI1NkA>
Subject: Re: [multipathtcp] towards a potential work item on two-ended proxy
X-BeenThere: multipathtcp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-path extensions for TCP <multipathtcp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/multipathtcp>, <mailto:multipathtcp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/multipathtcp/>
List-Post: <mailto:multipathtcp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:multipathtcp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/multipathtcp>, <mailto:multipathtcp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2016 17:54:25 -0000





On 02/08/16 16:55, "philip.eardley@bt.com" <philip.eardley@bt.com> wrote:

>>It was also suggested to have a second (informational) document.
>>... So a potential work item may say something like:
>>The working group will detail the use cases /deployment scenarios, the 
>>operational considerations and .... [anything else? Interaction with 
>>endhost-to-endhost MPTCP?]
>WH> I would think: use cases/deployment scenarios, protocol extensions 
>WH> for the proxy
>> Interaction with end-host MPTCP should be covered in the use case/deployment scenario
>
>Phil:
>What are the interactions with endhost-to-endhost MPTCP?  I imagined there wouldn’t be any, but it sounds like there are some.

WH> there should be none, but the proxy should ensure he doesn’t touch it. Hence we are looking to understand if a dual ended proxy should  perform a proxy function or not. So the end-host is not impacted but the network-assisted proxies would be made aware what to do. Make sense?
> 
>
>Thanks
>phil