Re: [multipathtcp] Consensus call on potential MPTCP proxy work

Sébastien Barré <sebastien.barre@tessares.net> Tue, 25 April 2017 11:57 UTC

Return-Path: <sebastien.barre@tessares.net>
X-Original-To: multipathtcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: multipathtcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C69C012EC45 for <multipathtcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 04:57:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=tessares-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MsZVWrrKD-EP for <multipathtcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 04:57:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x22d.google.com (mail-wm0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B06212EC46 for <multipathtcp@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 04:57:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id r190so93954394wme.1 for <multipathtcp@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 04:57:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tessares-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=19TlH5OnhPg+ZOHBySLUQUzP0ZcykXYMuxb2kIic9UY=; b=gIizD8TqtOsYis02zG8hqbFj6Zuw8nhZrLNFdg02OT7XD72Rod0JBS29Qo+gD3M598 S4TJukPGpr1tIdyYsCX6yMQBeYslbuqHejK5l7ngmjTzuID6HKwzi7ANCp/UXrWmj/Up eFgsHFWVXkAFfk9Wun07AcIHizaZQ10dsvMb2BpQGK5gVyZQt1r7W/gOq0rnEqA4EX3U b/lGvvM1SPSbrWvgCgMttJFv4Uc3A5hBljPoyySfcDjvip4/My2tmhqWPBNhy0WVv0DJ 19s/7ebFltwKkABNxQpE59WHpHSAqtQ92F0GVfQMoC6wkW0e3kkamFMOSBNH0HZURZwk F/lg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=19TlH5OnhPg+ZOHBySLUQUzP0ZcykXYMuxb2kIic9UY=; b=ZusQdxhfrTx3xPG6TYCJmtkOmE6IJz4K3zPJ1OZk0Sf1uB82BjyNhPGcGlpyl4KJ30 FbsIAZ0ICh5JhttRY1q5Al8+nzEITehF5WafO+cxYOtR/KuQDeSMG7GJblhEDHyCQ8hH 2XVqJ5uXNua3fZTUovgUCaSZMornic+9hVWtY7eee4f39LQexLcH8ntWBpdnQa1FZb3x Oqk6H7WZNKL7SxuvfYuzXRSjWwCTWlWp97DXyyOt0rPh5XMUHDi7npw61mN19Kmkhm+y rW2ThMLG0g7fbm9cCTuQ8dWdty0D/5C9jvI1X4K8V7LU4PB0xU3J0lq37IvHzObLgQEQ 4NQg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/4llgfdyKTCKe0q+NFSMIIpVgkUfGWUbSFyzLtyNy9d1MmVQ9HY gi+aqpcOqxuF3lmtcOwxooIg2d+FF6a900cBSMmQ3yGa5K2XGLipfLbSrwLZg39LUWqQzgBfgTd nvF/q
X-Received: by 10.80.135.87 with SMTP id 23mr4849195edv.148.1493121431178; Tue, 25 Apr 2017 04:57:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.20] ([87.66.241.239]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l4sm4966767edb.35.2017.04.25.04.57.09 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 25 Apr 2017 04:57:10 -0700 (PDT)
To: philip.eardley@bt.com, mohamed.boucadair@orange.com, lars@netapp.com
References: <8c5ffa879686472594bfd3db2fa06076@rew09926dag03b.domain1.systemhost.net> <3F6DAF4F-87AD-411E-96A6-4FB52FF83F6D@netapp.com> <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B933009E51D3E@OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <225E7ED6-F614-4216-BF01-1E6E30605A3B@netapp.com> <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B933009E51D65@OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <fde4be28d9b6474bbde2d92c817dfecb@rew09926dag03b.domain1.systemhost.net>
Cc: multipathtcp@ietf.org
From: =?UTF-8?B?U8OpYmFzdGllbiBCYXJyw6k=?= <sebastien.barre@tessares.net>
Message-ID: <70244e39-1bf8-87ae-9718-8ddcd8a6ba69@tessares.net>
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2017 13:57:09 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <fde4be28d9b6474bbde2d92c817dfecb@rew09926dag03b.domain1.systemhost.net>
Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="------------DA97BE46482808FC075997BE"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/multipathtcp/E8tTGkJK9cnREKYVsIrKmclzHtQ>
Subject: Re: [multipathtcp] Consensus call on potential MPTCP proxy work
X-BeenThere: multipathtcp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-path extensions for TCP <multipathtcp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/multipathtcp>, <mailto:multipathtcp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/multipathtcp/>
List-Post: <mailto:multipathtcp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:multipathtcp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/multipathtcp>, <mailto:multipathtcp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2017 11:57:17 -0000

Hi all,


Op 25-04-17 om 09:11 schreef philip.eardley@bt.com:
> Just to clarify our interpretation of the various hums during the meeting.
>
> We interpreted them as indicating there was one topic that it was worthwhile doing a consensus call on. We did not interpret the hums as indicating clear consensus that we merely needed to confirm on the list.
>
> So far we see:
> In favour:
> christian.jacquenet@orange.com
> mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
> William Ivancic <ivancic@syzygyengineering.com>;
> Stefano Secci <stefano.secci@lip6.fr>;
> Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE/Antwerp) <wim.henderickx@nokia.com>;
> David Allan I <david.i.allan@ericsson.com>;
> Markus.Brunner3@swisscom.com
> Robert Skog <robert.skog@ericsson.com>;
> Olivier Bonaventure <Olivier.Bonaventure@uclouvain.be>;
> Costin Raiciu <costin.raiciu@cs.pub.ro>;
I am also in favour.
thanks,
Sébastien.
>
> Against:
> Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>;
> Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr>;
> Eggert, Lars <lars@netapp.com>;
>
>
> It is therefore important to hear views from other people. Of course it is also welcome for the technical discussion to continue (indeed, some people may want more of the technical discussion before giving their view on the consensus call).
>
> Thanks
> Phil & Yoshi
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com [mailto:mohamed.boucadair@orange.com]
> Sent: 21 April 2017 07:55
>
> [cut]
>
> Lacking that information, I don't see a new element here that could lead to change the consensus reached at the Chicago meeting (of course I'm not entitled to do that call anyway).
>
> _______________________________________________
> multipathtcp mailing list
> multipathtcp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/multipathtcp

-- 
Tessares SA <http://www.tessares.net> 	Sébastien Barréº | Co-Founder & COO
sebastien.barre@tessares.net | +32 10 39 22 55 | +32 472 24 67 40 
<mailto:sebastien.barre%40tessares.net>
Tessares SA | Hybrid Access Solutions
www.tessares.net <http://www.tessares.net>
6 Rue Louis de Geer, 1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium 
<https://www.google.com/maps?q=6+Rue+Louis+de+Geer,+1348+Ottignies-Louvain-la-Neuve,+Belgium> 


ºPraos Consulting SPRL


-- 

------------------------------
DISCLAIMER.
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended 
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. 
If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. 
This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the 
individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not 
disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender 
immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and 
delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient 
you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any 
action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly 
prohibited.