Re: [multipathtcp] I-D Action: draft-ietf-mptcp-rfc6824bis-07.txt

Christoph Paasch <cpaasch@apple.com> Sun, 13 November 2016 07:36 UTC

Return-Path: <cpaasch@apple.com>
X-Original-To: multipathtcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: multipathtcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC6AC1295CC for <multipathtcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 12 Nov 2016 23:36:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.799
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=apple.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0EwUIpfXUsIk for <multipathtcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 12 Nov 2016 23:36:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-in5.apple.com (mail-out5.apple.com [17.151.62.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 866B71295A3 for <multipathtcp@ietf.org>; Sat, 12 Nov 2016 23:36:41 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=apple.com; s=mailout2048s; c=relaxed/simple; q=dns/txt; i=@apple.com; t=1479022601; h=From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-id:To:Cc:MIME-version:Content-type: Content-transfer-encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:In-reply-to:References:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=vkt+qprbL6j/fnpUgTCih2CVb44OUIbZLflN1BwmK5o=; b=BXLGQwM8DZ4Hz/nFODyVVKaN/eJTG3pi402WI1QvSm0p6bH9p/DtI2RSj4sh7FYN 0N5AdxTaGd3tacU+gsw/eRa9zQU5lmgIAdjU7rCXfWYdJfcnyaB+Oup5UK3VdVq3 Z97O3ffvWhHiG+nvMKwCHj6RtYA6Zum31V1LlgmiQZ9ULOLTcy/nhAinwpTVh2Pn Ebwgo7vk/kDCQxpGlwaGFkI+tFgoGPU6XJ1uQBhknZI7O2obw8wt/FVfgZIigxk/ Qe0WQMUrWiTAPUBBfJmEqcK+YvI1y5jnL/Jew56134NF7bMtls8cgCP97PXssqEV G6F7SfjksyEzRbvfAvCt0Q==;
Received: from relay6.apple.com (relay6.apple.com [17.128.113.90]) by mail-in5.apple.com (Apple Secure Mail Relay) with SMTP id 5E.07.12011.90818285; Sat, 12 Nov 2016 23:36:41 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: 11973e13-68e279a000002eeb-68-582818098fa5
Received: from chive.apple.com (chive.apple.com [17.128.115.15]) by relay6.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with SMTP id CB.5F.23613.80818285; Sat, 12 Nov 2016 23:36:41 -0800 (PST)
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 8BIT
Content-disposition: inline
Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Received: from localhost ([17.150.210.10]) by chive.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 8.0.1.1.0 64bit (built Jun 15 2016)) with ESMTPSA id <0OGK00INML54V560@chive.apple.com>; Sat, 12 Nov 2016 23:36:40 -0800 (PST)
Sender: cpaasch@apple.com
Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2016 23:36:40 -0800
From: Christoph Paasch <cpaasch@apple.com>
To: Alan Ford <alan.ford@gmail.com>
Message-id: <20161113073640.GG4269@Chimay.local>
References: <147768612704.25003.10632486814751714234.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <27232502-18DE-4BA1-9AD3-B99F0341CB78@gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <27232502-18DE-4BA1-9AD3-B99F0341CB78@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.1 (2016-10-04)
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFrrALMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUi2FAYpcspoRFhsGepoMXKcyuYLT6vvs7m wOSxc9Zddo8lS34yBTBFcdmkpOZklqUW6dslcGX8ur2MsWC1VMWMM6vYGhj/CXcxcnJICJhI rNs7g7GLkYtDSGAvo8T87YeZuxg5wBKzV4VBxDcySjz5sp0FpIFXQFDix+R7LCA1zALyEkcu ZYOEmQWkJR79ncEOEVaXmDIlF6L1FaPE10nN7CA1wgKSEt137jCD2CwCqhI/r/4Fs9kEtCTe 3m5nBekVEVCWWD6LFWKkpMSKv59YIVq9JLb8vcwEcYGBRMOaWcwQ8xuBTl4yA2w+p4CtxM7T V8DOFAWa8/cwyJlcQK8cYZM4e3Y2+wRGkVlIXpiF8MIsJC/MQnhhASPLKkah3MTMHN3MPFO9 xIKCnFS95PzcTYygKJhuJ7yD8fQqq0OMAhyMSjy8HJnqEUKsiWXFlbmHGKU5WJTEeTO91CKE BNITS1KzU1MLUovii0pzUosPMTJxcEo1MFq/yJoZ48C/MHe58Cz+eyZFF14VKterhBiELXnR l64k1zGbj+9KdbiYRm1wt9ePn4snMB9PXbbeY99+/zfL38isOKbWNPHkmbIP4ma69p+yVqxO SwnqV1dcdvFkfJipf9S5Xqfj3Yd3c/EmTDO4fkXF4MPNXVNao+fpcWznTIlKV3/if1QnVIml OCPRUIu5qDgRAKbCoJdjAgAA
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFprOIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUi2FDMr8spoRFhMGMPq8XKcyuYLT6vvs7m wOSxc9Zddo8lS34yBTBFcdmkpOZklqUW6dslcGX8ur2MsWC1VMWMM6vYGhj/CXcxcnBICJhI zF4V1sXICWSKSVy4t56ti5GLQ0hgI6PEky/bWUASvAKCEj8m32MBqWcWkJc4cikbJMwsIC3x 6O8MdoiwusSUKbkQra8YJb5OamYHqREWkJTovnOHGcRmEVCV+Hn1L5jNJqAl8fZ2OytIr4iA ssTyWawQIyUlVvz9xArR6iWx5e9lJogLDCQa1sxihpjfyCgxf8kMsPmcArYSO09fATtTFGjO 38P3WCYwCs1CcvUshKtnIbl6FsLVCxhZVjEKFKXmJFaa6SUWFOSk6iXn525iBAdzYdQOxobl VocYBTgYlXh4N6SpRwixJpYVV+YeYpTgYFYS4e0W1ogQ4k1JrKxKLcqPLyrNSS0+xJgM9O5E ZinR5HxgpOWVxBuamBiYGBubGRubm5iTJqwkznutQz5CSCA9sSQ1OzW1ILUIZgsTB6dUA+Mi wRtPj+5emjEtXnRVbrrk2uQ7Kueymt7tVH/nymG86WSs/9cukZh3oVOT0j8uz90beEc5u1Q3 Yb/2m+OJrPKeHR5Se+/x86ZPFF5oxBH3Vf9Hkw/XadfrG1fWLJs2wW7zdRHtii1X1duSX2Rq RTrkeaRPzD9caXD96PZgc7kUR++VLI6vrimxFGckGmoxFxUnAgAQyU3BqgIAAA==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/multipathtcp/QAlb8R0L9JqoIxDjyRlQxiE1dzo>
Cc: multipathtcp@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [multipathtcp] I-D Action: draft-ietf-mptcp-rfc6824bis-07.txt
X-BeenThere: multipathtcp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-path extensions for TCP <multipathtcp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/multipathtcp>, <mailto:multipathtcp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/multipathtcp/>
List-Post: <mailto:multipathtcp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:multipathtcp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/multipathtcp>, <mailto:multipathtcp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2016 07:36:42 -0000

Hello,

On 28/10/16 - 21:25:21, Alan Ford wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> This small rev to rfc6824bis applies the two changes proposed by Fabien which had support on the list:
> 
> - The flag on MP_CAPABLE to say “do not connect back to this address” (proposal 1/5)
> - The echo flag to make ADD_ADDR reliable (proposal 2/5)
> 
> The “do not use this address unless nothing else is available (proposal 3/5) did not appear to have much support on the list so has been left out for now.

I still support this proposal :)


Christoph

> 
> Proposals 4 and 5 are MIA so have not been added at this stage ;-)
> 
> Cheers,
> Alan
> 
> > On 28 Oct 2016, at 21:22, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
> > This draft is a work item of the Multipath TCP of the IETF.
> > 
> >        Title           : TCP Extensions for Multipath Operation with Multiple Addresses
> >        Authors         : Alan Ford
> >                          Costin Raiciu
> >                          Mark Handley
> >                          Olivier Bonaventure
> >                          Christoph Paasch
> > 	Filename        : draft-ietf-mptcp-rfc6824bis-07.txt
> > 	Pages           : 73
> > 	Date            : 2016-10-28
> > 
> > Abstract:
> >   TCP/IP communication is currently restricted to a single path per
> >   connection, yet multiple paths often exist between peers.  The
> >   simultaneous use of these multiple paths for a TCP/IP session would
> >   improve resource usage within the network and, thus, improve user
> >   experience through higher throughput and improved resilience to
> >   network failure.
> > 
> >   Multipath TCP provides the ability to simultaneously use multiple
> >   paths between peers.  This document presents a set of extensions to
> >   traditional TCP to support multipath operation.  The protocol offers
> >   the same type of service to applications as TCP (i.e., reliable
> >   bytestream), and it provides the components necessary to establish
> >   and use multiple TCP flows across potentially disjoint paths.
> > 
> >   This document specifies v1 of Multipath TCP, obsoleting v0 as
> >   specified in RFC6824 [RFC6824] through clarifications and
> >   modifications primarily driven by deployment experience.
> > 
> > 
> > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mptcp-rfc6824bis/
> > 
> > There's also a htmlized version available at:
> > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mptcp-rfc6824bis-07
> > 
> > A diff from the previous version is available at:
> > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-mptcp-rfc6824bis-07
> > 
> > 
> > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
> > until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
> > 
> > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > multipathtcp mailing list
> > multipathtcp@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/multipathtcp
> 
> _______________________________________________
> multipathtcp mailing list
> multipathtcp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/multipathtcp