Re: [multipathtcp] Regarding rate control at a subflow level

Olivier Bonaventure <olivier.bonaventure@uclouvain.be> Fri, 21 June 2019 08:13 UTC

Return-Path: <olivier.bonaventure@uclouvain.be>
X-Original-To: multipathtcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: multipathtcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA6D512015D for <multipathtcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Jun 2019 01:13:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=uclouvain.be
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id enV2zVHi4dyk for <multipathtcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Jun 2019 01:13:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EUR03-AM5-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr30115.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.3.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF7DA12015E for <multipathtcp@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Jun 2019 01:13:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=uclouvain.be; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=U9vn12XnBPIVHhR6FrPcQrEfvno9pSqMIZ5RXrFfOo8=; b=C9GywQIQinBEvUaJzMAMGA+NUBxvwQIaROFS9vIL59ZFhWIIOYOo8/8nJ+nnN96CrYNMkki0cq6FebbPkfj+Au2R4sToNKcLdVyl7HlbJJnoXRS/WhFjdMLA+CU9GJiTU4SEvHl8q0tCK6v6lgQQC+OIxz2WSmQe1cR608xABuM=
Received: from AM6PR03MB4085.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com (20.177.38.148) by AM6PR03MB6086.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.255.122.149) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.1987.15; Fri, 21 Jun 2019 08:13:35 +0000
Received: from AM6PR03MB4085.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::cd38:613d:2ef5:8e9e]) by AM6PR03MB4085.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::cd38:613d:2ef5:8e9e%7]) with mapi id 15.20.1987.014; Fri, 21 Jun 2019 08:13:35 +0000
From: Olivier Bonaventure <olivier.bonaventure@uclouvain.be>
To: "philip.eardley@bt.com" <philip.eardley@bt.com>, "cpaasch=40apple.com@dmarc.ietf.org" <cpaasch=40apple.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
CC: "multipathtcp@ietf.org" <multipathtcp@ietf.org>, "ashutosh.prakash@huawei.com" <ashutosh.prakash@huawei.com>, "nagesh.shamnur@huawei.com" <nagesh.shamnur@huawei.com>
Thread-Topic: [multipathtcp] Regarding rate control at a subflow level
Thread-Index: AdUMWULM15YYbMauQ2OybE7pkHW5IQAPgMiAAJ7rTAAGGheMoAAjeW0A
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2019 08:13:35 +0000
Message-ID: <7eca6827-5c07-4938-5ffa-42b6028da621@uclouvain.be>
References: <4AC96705FB868F42B2075BA50F806DEB56995EF6@dggema524-mbx.china.huawei.com> <4f40e635-2a80-20ec-c991-8a7a61ef327a@uclouvain.be> <20190520135014.GG41806@MacBook-Pro-64.local> <LNXP123MB25872FB755F07346E3C7D9E9EBE40@LNXP123MB2587.GBRP123.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
In-Reply-To: <LNXP123MB25872FB755F07346E3C7D9E9EBE40@LNXP123MB2587.GBRP123.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Reply-To: Olivier Bonaventure <olivier.bonaventure@uclouvain.be>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-clientproxiedby: LO2P265CA0238.GBRP265.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2603:10a6:600:b::34) To AM6PR03MB4085.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com (2603:10a6:20b:1a::20)
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=olivier.bonaventure@uclouvain.be;
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-originating-ip: [2001:6a8:308f:2:405b:4fe5:473c:91f8]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 19af85ad-9c90-4343-1eb9-08d6f6205b0e
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(5600148)(711020)(4605104)(1401327)(2017052603328)(7193020); SRVR:AM6PR03MB6086;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: AM6PR03MB6086:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <AM6PR03MB6086BA0768D31228C2CE6F8886E70@AM6PR03MB6086.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:6790;
x-forefront-prvs: 0075CB064E
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(346002)(396003)(366004)(136003)(376002)(39860400002)(199004)(189003)(46003)(5660300002)(102836004)(14444005)(8936002)(6506007)(81166006)(476003)(11346002)(6512007)(71190400001)(31686004)(8676002)(446003)(2616005)(52116002)(386003)(558084003)(2501003)(99286004)(186003)(36756003)(7736002)(6436002)(43066004)(81156014)(31696002)(71200400001)(86362001)(2906002)(64756008)(53936002)(54906003)(305945005)(14454004)(73956011)(76176011)(3450700001)(66446008)(66946007)(6246003)(486006)(66476007)(25786009)(110136005)(66556008)(229853002)(786003)(6486002)(316002)(68736007)(4326008)(478600001)(6116002)(256004)(74482002)(20673002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:AM6PR03MB6086; H:AM6PR03MB4085.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: uclouvain.be does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: VdA4lT4LXnS/F//SMzQ66d2UeZw57VRIWPOXQVvBBvNGFvUWGCHhDsRpllbeWYZwnMradp8ouyGv/ZGdUhcoPXyEkL0rlfruD3A9gIgUccJRqn0Zi6X/IEsSTctCLt7N6u7IUx/k6UOxPK/7CHgTKULESaK6AhDT6biOWI92PAonHVMkUg2YwxgFZBWU41OANjz3V4JQs4zaBthXH6XkHfmBSD5g/5KvSp/a+DRHtXeTFRyb9fnCa87y+Wh3TnLX2rLyTjrzrswmEShCc6DON+ZmUYtTv8YqSj9xzoLoMiTvebopUC34OImAix21cQJ1Tcj5lB8IlQ6YObc8VifadsKI5ywbr08MR9Nf/Vm94OOIevT4xiFNnXeV6TnqncdScVvb066GbGDzHvJApapgTPMvunq3ztZV1e1VpomULzM=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <1E39B07A3DD38D48962F3F0301444073@eurprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: uclouvain.be
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 19af85ad-9c90-4343-1eb9-08d6f6205b0e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 21 Jun 2019 08:13:35.2878 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 7ab090d4-fa2e-4ecf-bc7c-4127b4d582ec
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: olivier.bonaventure@uclouvain.be
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: AM6PR03MB6086
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/multipathtcp/RwKom640s855HPJ0bTYQABDqstM>
Subject: Re: [multipathtcp] Regarding rate control at a subflow level
X-BeenThere: multipathtcp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-path extensions for TCP <multipathtcp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/multipathtcp>, <mailto:multipathtcp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/multipathtcp/>
List-Post: <mailto:multipathtcp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:multipathtcp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/multipathtcp>, <mailto:multipathtcp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2019 08:13:42 -0000

Phil,

> Do other people think it's an important requirement to have graceful close of a subflow? (ie something better than sending TCP_RST on the subflow)

I believe that this would be an important feature for applications that 
understand MPTCP.



Olivier