Re: [multipathtcp] towards a potential work item on two-ended proxy

Rao Shoaib <rao.shoaib@oracle.com> Mon, 01 August 2016 20:43 UTC

Return-Path: <rao.shoaib@oracle.com>
X-Original-To: multipathtcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: multipathtcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A923E12D8E8 for <multipathtcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 13:43:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.507
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.507 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.287, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AKj4Paw6X0ql for <multipathtcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 13:43:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from userp1040.oracle.com (userp1040.oracle.com [156.151.31.81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B65312D8C5 for <multipathtcp@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 13:43:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from userv0021.oracle.com (userv0021.oracle.com [156.151.31.71]) by userp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2) with ESMTP id u71KhQFN009457 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 1 Aug 2016 20:43:26 GMT
Received: from aserv0122.oracle.com (aserv0122.oracle.com [141.146.126.236]) by userv0021.oracle.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id u71KhPU0002584 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 1 Aug 2016 20:43:26 GMT
Received: from abhmp0010.oracle.com (abhmp0010.oracle.com [141.146.116.16]) by aserv0122.oracle.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id u71KhN4n027535; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 20:43:24 GMT
Received: from [10.159.157.33] (/10.159.157.33) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Mon, 01 Aug 2016 13:43:23 -0700
To: "Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE)" <wim.henderickx@nokia.com>, "multipathtcp@ietf.org" <multipathtcp@ietf.org>
References: <b779dd12f1bb412c96c800eddaaf0247@rew09926dag03b.domain1.systemhost.net> <e2aa6ac517194af4b8c25c07f8e469fb@rew09926dag03b.domain1.systemhost.net> <9cafc779-502e-cc7f-676c-f6659e207c81@uclouvain.be> <3100ff74-0c7d-1815-03a1-aa4cec36d1e4@oracle.com> <3D8D4118-39CA-46A6-BFBD-026376C02058@nokia.com> <811b2c78-0976-6994-d759-8cac5fa58864@oracle.com> <0084773F-53E5-41A4-A244-430DAF12322A@nokia.com> <1f67528e-5bc2-5c49-db8f-903b95da0409@oracle.com> <9A3D1498-3EC9-4E80-8731-730999F8739C@nokia.com>
From: Rao Shoaib <rao.shoaib@oracle.com>
Message-ID: <3002cdcb-21c7-86da-01dd-ce969e47e694@oracle.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2016 13:43:18 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <9A3D1498-3EC9-4E80-8731-730999F8739C@nokia.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------44C1911B9AA8BE8E0FA986C6"
X-Source-IP: userv0021.oracle.com [156.151.31.71]
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/multipathtcp/WqSM0d_Gq_n_8q0U7fsiHf4eBu0>
Subject: Re: [multipathtcp] towards a potential work item on two-ended proxy
X-BeenThere: multipathtcp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-path extensions for TCP <multipathtcp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/multipathtcp>, <mailto:multipathtcp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/multipathtcp/>
List-Post: <mailto:multipathtcp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:multipathtcp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/multipathtcp>, <mailto:multipathtcp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2016 20:43:28 -0000


On 08/01/2016 01:40 PM, Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE) wrote:
>
>
> From: Rao Shoaib <rao.shoaib@oracle.com <mailto:rao.shoaib@oracle.com>>
> Date: Monday 1 August 2016 at 21:46
> To: Wim Henderickx <wim.henderickx@nokia.com 
> <mailto:wim.henderickx@nokia.com>>, "multipathtcp@ietf.org 
> <mailto:multipathtcp@ietf.org>" <multipathtcp@ietf.org 
> <mailto:multipathtcp@ietf.org>>
> Subject: Re: [multipathtcp] towards a potential work item on two-ended 
> proxy
>
>
>
> On 08/01/2016 12:05 PM, Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE) wrote:
>>> I liked the initial proposal as it did not require any changes to the
>>> >protocol. These change (as I have said before) seem very deployment
>>> >specific and IMHO should not be part of the protocol.
>> WH> I would disagree since you don’t always control the addressing and it is better to have an explicit signaling in the protocol what to expect to happen.
> Can you kindly provide an example of another standard IETF protocol 
> that has this feature or something similar.
>
> WH> I am not sure how relevant this is but you can find them in SIP 
> e.g. Let have the discussion on th requirements. We already indicated 
> that the usage of SOCKS is too chatty which is an OOB mechanism we 
> propose. In the scenario’s we have in mind it is better to do this 
> in-band in the protocol to avoid the extra latency.
Sounds good.

Shoaib
>
>
> Shoaib