Re: [multipathtcp] towards a potential work item on two-ended proxy
Rao Shoaib <rao.shoaib@oracle.com> Mon, 01 August 2016 20:43 UTC
Return-Path: <rao.shoaib@oracle.com>
X-Original-To: multipathtcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: multipathtcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A923E12D8E8
for <multipathtcp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 13:43:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.507
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.507 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3,
RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01,
RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.287, SPF_PASS=-0.001]
autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id AKj4Paw6X0ql for <multipathtcp@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Mon, 1 Aug 2016 13:43:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from userp1040.oracle.com (userp1040.oracle.com [156.151.31.81])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B65312D8C5
for <multipathtcp@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 13:43:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from userv0021.oracle.com (userv0021.oracle.com [156.151.31.71])
by userp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2) with ESMTP id
u71KhQFN009457
(version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK);
Mon, 1 Aug 2016 20:43:26 GMT
Received: from aserv0122.oracle.com (aserv0122.oracle.com [141.146.126.236])
by userv0021.oracle.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id u71KhPU0002584
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK);
Mon, 1 Aug 2016 20:43:26 GMT
Received: from abhmp0010.oracle.com (abhmp0010.oracle.com [141.146.116.16])
by aserv0122.oracle.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id u71KhN4n027535;
Mon, 1 Aug 2016 20:43:24 GMT
Received: from [10.159.157.33] (/10.159.157.33)
by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0)
with ESMTP ; Mon, 01 Aug 2016 13:43:23 -0700
To: "Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE)" <wim.henderickx@nokia.com>,
"multipathtcp@ietf.org" <multipathtcp@ietf.org>
References: <b779dd12f1bb412c96c800eddaaf0247@rew09926dag03b.domain1.systemhost.net>
<e2aa6ac517194af4b8c25c07f8e469fb@rew09926dag03b.domain1.systemhost.net>
<9cafc779-502e-cc7f-676c-f6659e207c81@uclouvain.be>
<3100ff74-0c7d-1815-03a1-aa4cec36d1e4@oracle.com>
<3D8D4118-39CA-46A6-BFBD-026376C02058@nokia.com>
<811b2c78-0976-6994-d759-8cac5fa58864@oracle.com>
<0084773F-53E5-41A4-A244-430DAF12322A@nokia.com>
<1f67528e-5bc2-5c49-db8f-903b95da0409@oracle.com>
<9A3D1498-3EC9-4E80-8731-730999F8739C@nokia.com>
From: Rao Shoaib <rao.shoaib@oracle.com>
Message-ID: <3002cdcb-21c7-86da-01dd-ce969e47e694@oracle.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2016 13:43:18 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/45.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <9A3D1498-3EC9-4E80-8731-730999F8739C@nokia.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="------------44C1911B9AA8BE8E0FA986C6"
X-Source-IP: userv0021.oracle.com [156.151.31.71]
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/multipathtcp/WqSM0d_Gq_n_8q0U7fsiHf4eBu0>
Subject: Re: [multipathtcp] towards a potential work item on two-ended proxy
X-BeenThere: multipathtcp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multi-path extensions for TCP <multipathtcp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/multipathtcp>,
<mailto:multipathtcp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/multipathtcp/>
List-Post: <mailto:multipathtcp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:multipathtcp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/multipathtcp>,
<mailto:multipathtcp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2016 20:43:28 -0000
On 08/01/2016 01:40 PM, Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE) wrote: > > > From: Rao Shoaib <rao.shoaib@oracle.com <mailto:rao.shoaib@oracle.com>> > Date: Monday 1 August 2016 at 21:46 > To: Wim Henderickx <wim.henderickx@nokia.com > <mailto:wim.henderickx@nokia.com>>, "multipathtcp@ietf.org > <mailto:multipathtcp@ietf.org>" <multipathtcp@ietf.org > <mailto:multipathtcp@ietf.org>> > Subject: Re: [multipathtcp] towards a potential work item on two-ended > proxy > > > > On 08/01/2016 12:05 PM, Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE) wrote: >>> I liked the initial proposal as it did not require any changes to the >>> >protocol. These change (as I have said before) seem very deployment >>> >specific and IMHO should not be part of the protocol. >> WH> I would disagree since you don’t always control the addressing and it is better to have an explicit signaling in the protocol what to expect to happen. > Can you kindly provide an example of another standard IETF protocol > that has this feature or something similar. > > WH> I am not sure how relevant this is but you can find them in SIP > e.g. Let have the discussion on th requirements. We already indicated > that the usage of SOCKS is too chatty which is an OOB mechanism we > propose. In the scenario’s we have in mind it is better to do this > in-band in the protocol to avoid the extra latency. Sounds good. Shoaib > > > Shoaib
- Re: [multipathtcp] towards a potential work item … philip.eardley
- Re: [multipathtcp] towards a potential work item … Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE)
- Re: [multipathtcp] towards a potential work item … Alan Ford
- Re: [multipathtcp] towards a potential work item … Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE)
- Re: [multipathtcp] towards a potential work item … Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE)
- Re: [multipathtcp] towards a potential work item … philip.eardley
- Re: [multipathtcp] towards a potential work item … Alan Ford
- Re: [multipathtcp] towards a potential work item … Christoph Paasch
- Re: [multipathtcp] towards a potential work item … David Allan I
- Re: [multipathtcp] towards a potential work item … Markus.Brunner3
- Re: [multipathtcp] towards a potential work item … mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [multipathtcp] towards a potential work item … Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE)
- Re: [multipathtcp] towards a potential work item … Christoph Paasch
- Re: [multipathtcp] towards a potential work item … Markus.Brunner3
- Re: [multipathtcp] towards a potential work item … mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [multipathtcp] towards a potential work item … Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE)
- Re: [multipathtcp] towards a potential work item … Alan Ford
- Re: [multipathtcp] towards a potential work item … Markus.Brunner3
- Re: [multipathtcp] towards a potential work item … mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [multipathtcp] towards a potential work item … mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [multipathtcp] towards a potential work item … Alan Ford
- Re: [multipathtcp] towards a potential work item … mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [multipathtcp] towards a potential work item … Christoph Paasch
- Re: [multipathtcp] towards a potential work item … Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE)
- Re: [multipathtcp] towards a potential work item … Tommy Pauly
- Re: [multipathtcp] towards a potential work item … philip.eardley
- Re: [multipathtcp] towards a potential work item … Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE)
- Re: [multipathtcp] towards a potential work item … Rao Shoaib
- Re: [multipathtcp] towards a potential work item … Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE)
- Re: [multipathtcp] towards a potential work item … Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE)
- Re: [multipathtcp] towards a potential work item … Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE)
- Re: [multipathtcp] towards a potential work item … Ivancic, William D. (GRC-LCA0)
- Re: [multipathtcp] towards a potential work item … philip.eardley
- Re: [multipathtcp] towards a potential work item … Alan Ford
- Re: [multipathtcp] towards a potential work item … mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [multipathtcp] towards a potential work item … Christoph Paasch
- Re: [multipathtcp] towards a potential work item … christian.jacquenet
- Re: [multipathtcp] towards a potential work item … mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [multipathtcp] towards a potential work item … mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [multipathtcp] towards a potential work item … Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE)
- Re: [multipathtcp] towards a potential work item … Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE)
- Re: [multipathtcp] towards a potential work item … Yoshifumi Nishida
- Re: [multipathtcp] towards a potential work item … Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE)
- Re: [multipathtcp] towards a potential work item … Yoshifumi Nishida
- [multipathtcp] towards a potential work item on t… philip.eardley
- Re: [multipathtcp] towards a potential work item … Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE)
- Re: [multipathtcp] towards a potential work item … Rao Shoaib
- Re: [multipathtcp] towards a potential work item … Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE)
- Re: [multipathtcp] towards a potential work item … Rao Shoaib
- Re: [multipathtcp] towards a potential work item … Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE)
- Re: [multipathtcp] towards a potential work item … Rao Shoaib
- Re: [multipathtcp] towards a potential work item … philip.eardley
- Re: [multipathtcp] towards a potential work item … Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE)
- Re: [multipathtcp] towards a potential work item … Rao Shoaib
- Re: [multipathtcp] towards a potential work item … Olivier Bonaventure
- Re: [multipathtcp] towards a potential work item … mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [multipathtcp] towards a potential work item … Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE)
- Re: [multipathtcp] towards a potential work item … Olivier Bonaventure