Re: [multipathtcp] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-mptcp-experience-06: (with COMMENT)

[Olivier Bonaventure <[e-mail]>]

Phil,

> I didn’t see any more emails in this thread. Stephen, are you happy with the proposed text?
>
> The proposed text works for me and I think is an interesting point to add - but I'm not sure it directly answers your point (I guess the answer is something like 'No information about MPTCP-tailored attacks' or 'no information that can be shared')

I haven't seen reports of actual attacks that tageted MPTCP or used 
MPTCP to perform an attack. The closests discussions that I'm aware of 
are the two references that I mentioned in the updated text

    [PT14]     Pearce, C. and P. Thomas, "Multipath TCP Breaking Today's
               Networks with Tomorrow's Protocols", Proc. Blackhat
               Briefings , 2014, <http://www.blackhat.com/docs/us-14/
               materials/
               us-14-Pearce-Multipath-TCP-Breaking-Todays-Networks-With-
               Tomorrows-Protocols-WP.pdf>.

    [PZ15]     Pearce, C. and S. Zeadally, "Ancillary Impacts of
               Multipath TCP on Current and Future Network Security",
               IEEE Internet Computing, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 58-65 , 2015.

>
> Olivier & authors - is it possible to do a new version of the document please - I think the Discuss and the other comments are quite easy to resolve, and it would be good to publish the document (finally!)

We have an updated text but I was expecting comments on this security 
part which is the main change that was requested by the reviewers


Olivier