Re: [multipathtcp] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6824 (3578)

Yoshifumi Nishida <nishida@sfc.wide.ad.jp> Thu, 04 April 2013 06:29 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20130401161148.CA1FAB1E003@rfc-editor.org>
References: <20130401161148.CA1FAB1E003@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2013 23:28:56 -0700
Message-ID: <CAO249yfChaVv90ad3Brvt4wFb6voWXBQfquf8CUE+ZgHi3=q-Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Yoshifumi Nishida <nishida@sfc.wide.ad.jp>
To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="bcaec55408acc7cebc04d98315a8"
Cc: costin.raiciu@cs.pub.ro, alanford@cisco.com, multipathtcp <multipathtcp@ietf.org>, Mark Handley <m.handley@cs.ucl.ac.uk>, rfc@wgdfq.01.apr.2013.kasperd.net
Subject: Re: [multipathtcp] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6824 (3578)
Precedence: list

Hello,
I believe that this errta is correct. But, the type should be editorial
since this is nothing more than an editorial mistake.
I think we'll need confirmation from authors to proceed this.

Thanks,
--
Yoshifumi



On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 9:11 AM, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
> wrote:

> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6824,
> "TCP Extensions for Multipath Operation with Multiple Addresses".
>
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6824&eid=3578
>
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Technical
> Reported by: Kasper Dupont <rfc@wgdfq.01.apr.2013.kasperd.net>
>
> Section: 3.1
>
> Original Text
> -------------
>   Note that new subflows MUST NOT be established (using
>
>    the process documented in Section 3.2) until a Digital Signature
>
>    Standard (DSS) option has been successfully received across the path
>
>    (as documented in Section 3.3).
>
>
>
> Corrected Text
> --------------
>   Note that new subflows MUST NOT be established (using
>
>    the process documented in Section 3.2) until a Data Sequence
>
>    Signal (DSS) option has been successfully received across the path
>
>    (as documented in Section 3.3).
>
>
>
> Notes
> -----
> In this document DSS is indicated as short for both "Digital Signature
> Standard" and "Data Sequence Signal". I guess the reference to "Digital
> Signature Standard" was a mistake.
>
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
>
> --------------------------------------
> RFC6824 (draft-ietf-mptcp-multiaddressed-12)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : TCP Extensions for Multipath Operation with Multiple
> Addresses
> Publication Date    : January 2013
> Author(s)           : A. Ford, C. Raiciu, M. Handley, O. Bonaventure
> Category            : EXPERIMENTAL
> Source              : Multipath TCP
> Area                : Transport
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
>

[multipathtcp] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC682… RFC Errata System
Re: [multipathtcp] [Technical Errata Reported] RF… Yoshifumi Nishida