Subject: Re: [multipathtcp] Possible future items for mptcp WG
From: Yoshifumi Nishida <[email-masked]>
To: Xavier de Foy <[email-masked]>
Cc: Yoshifumi Nishida <[email-masked]>, multipathtcp <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2018 01:04:06 -0700
List-Id: Multi-path extensions for TCP <multipathtcp.ietf.org>

Hi Xavier,

Thank you so much!
Yes, we have thought about 5G stuff as well.
The reason why we haven't included in the list below was it might not be a
short term topic while it can be important for mptcp in future.
New suggestions to mptcp with regard to this topic will always be very
welcome.
--
Yoshi

On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 2:01 PM, Xavier de Foy <[email-masked]>
wrote:

> Yoshifumi & Phil,
>
>   Another potential item under "Feature Extensions" could be dedicated to
> interoperability with 5G. We are preparing an update to the "5G
> considerations" draft presented in the last session, which can be used as
> input for the group to decide if it should be on this list.
>
>   Best Regards,
> Xavier
>
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 3:16 AM, Yoshifumi Nishida <[email-masked]
> > wrote:
>
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> Phil and I have been discussing the next step for the WG.
>> After we finish 6824bis, we ｗon't have active WG items as the proxy work
>> will be discussed at tcpm WG.
>> One suggestion might be to close the WG or to put it in dormant state,
>> however, we are thinking there still might be some more working items as
>> we've seen interesting presentations for new ideas, experiment results
>> and so on at the meetings and on the ML.
>>
>> Below is the list of potential working items from the chairs' point of
>> view.
>> Please let us know if you think some of them are important items for the
>> WG (and your willingness to contribute if possible) or there are some
>> more items, or this is not something we should work on, etc.
>>
>> Also, if you have some opinions on the status of the WG or suggestions to
>> the chairs, please let us hear!
>>
>> We appreciate your feedback
>>
>> Thanks,
>> --
>> Yoshi & Phil
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 1: API extensions (This is already in our charter)
>>     draft-hesmans-mptcp-socket
>>     draft-samar-mptcp-socketapi
>>
>> 2: Feature extensions
>>     a) robust initial setup
>>         proposed by Markus, also Kien presented a similar idea
>>
>>     b) fast subflow setup
>>         proposed by Quentin
>>
>>     c) security enhancement
>>         1) TLS
>>             draft-bonaventure-mptcp-tls-00
>>             draft-paasch-mptcp-tls-authentication-00
>>
>>         2) Utilize proposals from tcpinc?
>>
>>         3) Elliptic Curve Cryptography
>>             draft-kim-mptcp-semptcp-00
>>
>>     d) Solutions for operational issues
>>          1) how to handle nat64 issue proposed by Quentin
>>          2) how to handle load balancer proposed by Fabien, Christoph,
>> Costin
>>
>> 3: Congestion Control (This topic itself should probably be discussed at
>> ICCRG. But, it may trigger some updates of the protocol or APIs later)
>>      a) OLIA
>>           draft-khalili-mptcp-congestion-control-05
>>
>>      b) mptcp + BBR?
>>           presented by Jing
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> multipathtcp mailing list
>> [email-masked]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/multipathtcp
>>
>>
>