[multipathtcp] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-mptcp-experience-06: (with COMMENT)
"Ben Campbell" <ben@nostrum.com> Thu, 15 September 2016 00:52 UTC
Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: multipathtcp@ietf.org
Delivered-To: multipathtcp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66BCC12B0D0; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 17:52:03 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.33.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <147390072338.29788.17044849429232369661.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 17:52:03 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/multipathtcp/w-Q3WTn7bE8gAK2kIWqWppPzgMc>
Cc: multipathtcp@ietf.org, mptcp-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-mptcp-experience@ietf.org
Subject: [multipathtcp] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-mptcp-experience-06: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: multipathtcp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
List-Id: Multi-path extensions for TCP <multipathtcp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/multipathtcp>, <mailto:multipathtcp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/multipathtcp/>
List-Post: <mailto:multipathtcp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:multipathtcp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/multipathtcp>, <mailto:multipathtcp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2016 00:52:03 -0000
Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-mptcp-experience-06: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mptcp-experience/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I support Stephen's comment, and have a few minor comments of my own (none of which are showstoppers): -1, first paragraph: I'm not sure we should describe an experimental RFC as "standardized". -1, mention of iOS7: Is this really limited to iOS7 and not future versions? Would it make since to say that "Since September 2013...is also supported ... iOS"? (i.e. without the version?) (Noting that iOS10 released this week...) - 2.2, paragraph 9: Figure 1 just shows a generic 2 path connection. It doesn't seem to "summarize" the described scenario. -2.2, 2nd paragraph after figure 1: I'm pretty sure there are in fact real applications that transfer bulk data. Do you mean to say that "Some [or even many or most] real applications do not..."
- [multipathtcp] Ben Campbell's No Objection on dra… Ben Campbell
- Re: [multipathtcp] Ben Campbell's No Objection on… Olivier Bonaventure
- Re: [multipathtcp] Ben Campbell's No Objection on… Ben Campbell