Re: [multipathtcp] Consensus call on potential MPTCP proxy work

Ullrich,

FYI - the IETF is a place for individual expression, not corporate
endorsement.

So you, individually, support this work. Nothing else.

Joe

On 4/28/2017 5:31 AM, Meyer, Ullrich, Vodafone DE wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> herewith I want to declare very clearly our (Vodafone) interest on that
> MPTCP proxy work within the IETF. The work has our plenary support.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Ullrich Meyer 
> Senior Engineer Service Design
> VPN Solution Engineering within
> Group Network Engineering and Delivery
> FixLine: +49 69 2169 3290
> Mobile: +49 172 190 3120
> Email: ullrich.meyer@vodafone.com
>
> Vodafone GmbH, Düsseldorfer Straße 15, 65760 Eschborn
> vodafone-deutschland.de 
>
> Die gesetzlichen Pflichtangaben finden Sie unter
> www.vodafone.de/pflichtangaben 
>
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: philip.eardley@bt.com [mailto:philip.eardley@bt.com] 
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 25. April 2017 09:12
> An: BOUCADAIR Mohamed IMT/OLN <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>;
> lars@netapp.com
> Cc: multipathtcp@ietf.org
> Betreff: RE: [multipathtcp] Consensus call on potential MPTCP proxy work
>
> Just to clarify our interpretation of the various hums during the meeting.
>
> We interpreted them as indicating there was one topic that it was worthwhile
> doing a consensus call on. We did not interpret the hums as indicating clear
> consensus that we merely needed to confirm on the list.
>
> So far we see:
> In favour:
> christian.jacquenet@orange.com
> mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
> William Ivancic <ivancic@syzygyengineering.com> Stefano Secci
> <stefano.secci@lip6.fr> Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)
> <wim.henderickx@nokia.com> David Allan I <david.i.allan@ericsson.com>
> Markus.Brunner3@swisscom.com Robert Skog <robert.skog@ericsson.com> Olivier
> Bonaventure <Olivier.Bonaventure@uclouvain.be>
> Costin Raiciu <costin.raiciu@cs.pub.ro>
>
> Against:
> Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>
> Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> Eggert, Lars
> <lars@netapp.com>
>
>
> It is therefore important to hear views from other people. Of course it is
> also welcome for the technical discussion to continue (indeed, some people
> may want more of the technical discussion before giving their view on the
> consensus call).
>
> Thanks
> Phil & Yoshi
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com [mailto:mohamed.boucadair@orange.com]
> Sent: 21 April 2017 07:55
>
> [cut]
>
> Lacking that information, I don't see a new element here that could lead to
> change the consensus reached at the Chicago meeting (of course I'm not
> entitled to do that call anyway).
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> multipathtcp mailing list
> multipathtcp@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/multipathtcp