Re: [multrans] Issues charts for presentation at the BoF

Tom Taylor <tom111.taylor@bell.net> Tue, 28 June 2011 01:27 UTC

Return-Path: <tom111.taylor@bell.net>
X-Original-To: multrans@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: multrans@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D16D21F859B for <multrans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 18:27:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -100.651
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.651 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.145, BAYES_00=-2.599, MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER=0.803, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lAuIBHIwhklb for <multrans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 18:27:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from blu0-omc4-s20.blu0.hotmail.com (blu0-omc4-s20.blu0.hotmail.com [65.55.111.159]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 433F221F8598 for <multrans@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 18:27:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from BLU0-SMTP18 ([65.55.111.137]) by blu0-omc4-s20.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 27 Jun 2011 18:27:29 -0700
X-Originating-IP: [65.94.104.44]
X-Originating-Email: [tom111.taylor@bell.net]
Message-ID: <BLU0-SMTP180BF1B6A4B7CC9AB6C292D8560@phx.gbl>
Received: from [192.168.2.17] ([65.94.104.44]) by BLU0-SMTP18.phx.gbl over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 27 Jun 2011 18:27:29 -0700
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 21:27:29 -0400
From: Tom Taylor <tom111.taylor@bell.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110616 Thunderbird/3.1.11
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Dan Wing <dwing@cisco.com>
References: <BLU0-SMTP581602B6944276BA936378D8570@phx.gbl>, <091301cc3519$bb3ddd30$31b99790$@com> <A2B9C57A-523D-47C3-87B0-0FC73F9A32AC@Cable.Comcast.com> <093c01cc3520$eea1f9c0$cbe5ed40$@com>
In-Reply-To: <093c01cc3520$eea1f9c0$cbe5ed40$@com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Jun 2011 01:27:29.0469 (UTC) FILETIME=[8BA9A6D0:01CC3532]
Cc: 'Multicast Transition' <multrans@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [multrans] Issues charts for presentation at the BoF
X-BeenThere: multrans@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discuss the work of IPv4-IPv6 multicast." <multrans.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/multrans>, <mailto:multrans-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/multrans>
List-Post: <mailto:multrans@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:multrans-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/multrans>, <mailto:multrans-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 01:27:31 -0000

I'm happy to do the charts. These slides were actually distilled from a 
more extensive presentation where the charts were available. I actually 
had in mind doing the charts as backup slides, in the interest of 
minimizing presentation time unless people had questions. I suppose 
"haste makes waste".

On 27/06/2011 7:21 PM, Dan Wing wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Lee, Yiu [mailto:Yiu_Lee@Cable.Comcast.com]
>> Sent: Monday, June 27, 2011 4:00 PM
>> To: Dan Wing
>> Cc: Tom Taylor; Multicast Transition
>> Subject: Re: [multrans] Issues charts for presentation at the BoF
>>
>> The undesirable scenario is building two MDT for the same content. The
>> desirable scenario could be building a MDT with IPvX and translate to
>> IPvY at the edge.
>
> A picture is worth 1000 words.
>
> -d
>
>
>> On Jun 27, 2011, at 18:29, "Dan Wing"<dwing@cisco.com>  wrote:
>>
>>> slide 10:  regarding the point: "Hence operating source in dual stack
>>> mode is undesirable", can you make a diagram showing examples of the
>>> desired architecture and the undesired architecture?
>
>
>