IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [multrans] Issues charts for presentation at the BoF

Jacni Qin <jacniq@gmail.com> Tue, 28 June 2011 01:27 UTC

Return-Path: <jacniq@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: multrans@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: multrans@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE44021F859A for <multrans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 18:27:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EBMysm4h1Ea8 for <multrans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 18:27:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vw0-f44.google.com (mail-vw0-f44.google.com [209.85.212.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51F4121F8594 for <multrans@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 18:27:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by vws12 with SMTP id 12so5248741vws.31 for <multrans@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 18:27:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=Y4RF7VdIWTCwQsxALFjDG2b4biei/OKcLs2YdrPPj24=; b=mQY3oYZ61CGMd9cKI4GX6HwZdnDIxk7x0b87uIPpdhrT3ZU/SYj247+l6T5MkiowNH qxe8OMFbRAzYaHCTCZxgttAJEZy5AOT8lnAijeR10h7aIQO/69Z+Voc4UrU9YopdVyru 2k0QJIeVa52TTiQ2TVEIzrG/QQI8OSlALsnqk=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=rTwA6LifUpbbAJEbtNSK86afy2aMurtHe/g8Pw93yRynVRqZlctln+iMCKRzi6lCZO bwNmhLmNDbJw/ro7nIw/Lqh014uQyR1CvQALTP5tCevT3yed7nUTJU6bm6LahtErUh6v ONFrMthLO8P/uMN+bNFiP59k6sYoOEq1N/pfs=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.52.179.4 with SMTP id dc4mr177322vdc.97.1309224459249; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 18:27:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.52.184.165 with HTTP; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 18:27:39 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <091301cc3519$bb3ddd30$31b99790$@com>
References: <BLU0-SMTP581602B6944276BA936378D8570@phx.gbl> <091301cc3519$bb3ddd30$31b99790$@com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 09:27:39 +0800
Message-ID: <BANLkTi=UHSJYsGnCrPzE293xKZ0HkujZRg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jacni Qin <jacniq@gmail.com>
To: Dan Wing <dwing@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec517a95cd3282004a6bb92d6
Cc: Multicast Transition <multrans@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [multrans] Issues charts for presentation at the BoF
X-BeenThere: multrans@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discuss the work of IPv4-IPv6 multicast." <multrans.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/multrans>, <mailto:multrans-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/multrans>
List-Post: <mailto:multrans@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:multrans-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/multrans>, <mailto:multrans-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 01:27:42 -0000

Dan,

On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 6:29 AM, Dan Wing <dwing@cisco.com> wrote:

>
>
> slide 6: for IPv4, does "IGMP" encompass IGMPv1, v2, and v3?  That is,
> the list of interworking issues may be greater than described.
>

Jacni>: Yes, for example, one case of the interworking function IGMPv2 -
MLDv2


Cheers,
Jacni


> slide 10:  regarding the point: "Hence operating source in dual stack
> mode is undesirable", can you make a diagram showing examples of the
> desired architecture and the undesired architecture?
>
> -d
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> multrans mailing list
> multrans@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/multrans
>

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email