IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [multrans] Issues charts for presentation at the BoF

"Dan Wing" <dwing@cisco.com> Mon, 27 June 2011 22:29 UTC

Return-Path: <dwing@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: multrans@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: multrans@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B36D1F0C50 for <multrans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 15:29:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -109.3
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-109.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LYwJvYBbfS3V for <multrans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 15:29:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-iport-6.cisco.com (sj-iport-6.cisco.com [171.71.176.117]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 081F01F0C4B for <multrans@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 15:29:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=dwing@cisco.com; l=1125; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1309213791; x=1310423391; h=from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=kJ6YoLR25kNvXKiMVq4AmY1f8nAOpg8Y8KZDhacaW/k=; b=htHdFX2XkJIsbZI2m/zSpnJu3wyWuC7v02cpfA/gCt7+GW39zt0Gm7eC dGOssbFPw0BI9iLLYHSJtIU67XdsY2rT3O8QLE30wDdUkgoKXcllzAsrH ru7cXFfAIJjnhgzMHoINItnGEkk+P6DCktA9yw0YaTFV0kDmYMzfmzcMz s=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgUBAFkDCU6rRDoH/2dsb2JhbABSmAmBaI1Gd6phniOGMASHLJsS
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.65,434,1304294400"; d="scan'208";a="723038786"
Received: from mtv-core-2.cisco.com ([171.68.58.7]) by sj-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 27 Jun 2011 22:29:51 +0000
Received: from dwingWS (sjc-vpn5-1143.cisco.com [10.21.92.119]) by mtv-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p5RMTp84019615; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 22:29:51 GMT
From: "Dan Wing" <dwing@cisco.com>
To: "'Tom Taylor'" <tom111.taylor@bell.net>, "'Multicast Transition'" <multrans@ietf.org>
References: <BLU0-SMTP581602B6944276BA936378D8570@phx.gbl>
In-Reply-To: <BLU0-SMTP581602B6944276BA936378D8570@phx.gbl>
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 15:29:48 -0700
Message-ID: <091301cc3519$bb3ddd30$31b99790$@com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: Acw1BsgYxO1vdSUqQG+OKegxcbdDKAAEc+NA
Content-Language: en-us
Subject: Re: [multrans] Issues charts for presentation at the BoF
X-BeenThere: multrans@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discuss the work of IPv4-IPv6 multicast." <multrans.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/multrans>, <mailto:multrans-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/multrans>
List-Post: <mailto:multrans@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:multrans-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/multrans>, <mailto:multrans-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 22:29:52 -0000

> -----Original Message-----
> From: multrans-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:multrans-bounces@ietf.org] On
> Behalf Of Tom Taylor
> Sent: Monday, June 27, 2011 1:14 PM
> To: Multicast Transition
> Subject: [multrans] Issues charts for presentation at the BoF
> 
> Attached are the charts I propose should be presented on the "issues"
> topic at the MULTRANS BoF. Comments in advance are welcome.

slide 3:  RFC5135 was done in BEHAVE, so multicast is not new nor out
of scope of BEHAVE.  This slide implies otherwise. 

slide 4: I like that slide a lot

slide 5: in addition to listing standard protocols (SIP, HTML, SAP),
it should also be described that proprietary electronic program
guides also provide 'channel' information.  (at least, that is my
understanding.)

slide 6: for IPv4, does "IGMP" encompass IGMPv1, v2, and v3?  That is,
the list of interworking issues may be greater than described.

slide 10:  regarding the point: "Hence operating source in dual stack 
mode is undesirable", can you make a diagram showing examples of the 
desired architecture and the undesired architecture?

-d

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email