IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [multrans] Issues charts for presentation at the BoF

"Lee, Yiu" <Yiu_Lee@Cable.Comcast.com> Mon, 27 June 2011 23:03 UTC

Return-Path: <yiu_lee@cable.comcast.com>
X-Original-To: multrans@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: multrans@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B79731F0C56 for <multrans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 16:03:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.735
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.735 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UvWOnm2dHd5s for <multrans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 16:03:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cable.comcast.com (copdcimo01.potomac.co.ndcwest.comcast.net [76.96.32.251]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37FEC1F0C49 for <multrans@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 16:03:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ([24.40.55.41]) by copdcimo01.cable.comcast.com with ESMTP with TLS id 5503630.42466245; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 17:06:59 -0600
Received: from PACDCEXMB05.cable.comcast.com ([fe80::a5b0:e5c4:df1b:2367]) by PACDCEXHUB02.cable.comcast.com ([fe80::11d4:f530:37a0:9f4e%12]) with mapi id 14.01.0289.001; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 19:03:08 -0400
From: "Lee, Yiu" <Yiu_Lee@Cable.Comcast.com>
To: Dan Wing <dwing@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: [multrans] Issues charts for presentation at the BoF
Thread-Index: AQHMNQbIdRJOsqr+NUOnbuSZ3uW+BJTSDHIA///GQk0=
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 23:03:07 +0000
Message-ID: <747C9DEB-B0E5-42FC-B628-6F363297C205@Cable.Comcast.com>
References: <BLU0-SMTP581602B6944276BA936378D8570@phx.gbl>, <091301cc3519$bb3ddd30$31b99790$@com>
In-Reply-To: <091301cc3519$bb3ddd30$31b99790$@com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: Multicast Transition <multrans@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [multrans] Issues charts for presentation at the BoF
X-BeenThere: multrans@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discuss the work of IPv4-IPv6 multicast." <multrans.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/multrans>, <mailto:multrans-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/multrans>
List-Post: <mailto:multrans@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:multrans-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/multrans>, <mailto:multrans-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 23:03:14 -0000

I agree multicast isn't new. The objective of the BoF is to see we have people thinking this is in fact an important problem and willing to work on it.

On Jun 27, 2011, at 18:29, Dan Wing <dwing@cisco.com> wrote:

> slide 3:  RFC5135 was done in BEHAVE, so multicast is not new nor out
> of scope of BEHAVE.  This slide implies otherwise.

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email