[multrans] BOF 1 down..
Greg Shepherd <gjshep@gmail.com> Tue, 09 August 2011 16:01 UTC
Return-Path: <gjshep@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: multrans@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: multrans@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 5867D21F8C1A for <multrans@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Tue, 9 Aug 2011 09:01:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nr85hDhCbh4X for
<multrans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Aug 2011 09:01:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-fx0-f44.google.com (mail-fx0-f44.google.com
[209.85.161.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A364721F8C41 for
<multrans@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Aug 2011 09:01:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by fxe6 with SMTP id 6so193190fxe.31 for <multrans@ietf.org>;
Tue, 09 Aug 2011 09:01:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=mime-version:reply-to:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
bh=d3HHGX/wZdtpspaHi3gFtUmM9Na0+dZHwXJf/49quzQ=;
b=lvWdXBNTrXAweZ9I4SOr6EsTE4rosOc6vdULNmJeD+AQ1z3c1O64WT4q2LDP3RmrDg
rhvAauYtW5+VrNU9wB75ixc3Lev6QUUUt+CqNvEu6egi2+y6Xlg66Er4syuv7WkdRVdm
5Z6P7rKWq3MR2hde/CEFt499U17Ui9l9Fuyfs=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.204.20.203 with SMTP id g11mr744891bkb.233.1312905696997;
Tue, 09 Aug 2011 09:01:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.204.119.137 with HTTP; Tue, 9 Aug 2011 09:01:36 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2011 09:01:36 -0700
Message-ID: <CABFReBp-rAs5Up0zHFCUCs6WEeb0svubqScGdsNg+Ayk-uvOaw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Greg Shepherd <gjshep@gmail.com>
To: multrans@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Subject: [multrans] BOF 1 down..
X-BeenThere: multrans@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: gjshep@gmail.com
List-Id: "Discuss the work of IPv4-IPv6 multicast." <multrans.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/multrans>,
<mailto:multrans-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/multrans>
List-Post: <mailto:multrans@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:multrans-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/multrans>,
<mailto:multrans-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2011 16:01:12 -0000
Thanks everyone for attending/participating on the first Multrans BOF. I'll post the minutes on the list for approval before posting them at ietf.org so please look for them here later this week. I believe we did well in working toward focusing the issues brought do the group down to specific scenarios and prioritizing needs. But we'll need to solidify these two in advance of BOF II in Taipei. So first, we need to document use cases. I believe we had two "volunteers" at the BOF mention their willingness to document use cases. Please do so. This doesn't need to be a draft, but a detailed network diagram showing the relevant puzzle and missing piece(s). Once we've agreed upon use cases and have them well defined, we can document them in a consolidated use-case draft for general distribution. From this should come the prioritized list of issues. If we get this far before Taipei then I feel the next BOF could be even more productive as well can address the list and how it relates to other on-going IETF work to better identify what is missing from the current set of solutions. Thanks again everyone!, Greg
- [multrans] BOF 1 down.. Greg Shepherd
- Re: [multrans] BOF 1 down.. Tina TSOU