Re: [multrans] Draft Multrans BoF request

[Tom Taylor <[e-mail]>]

Please explain why you want to keep requirements and issues together. 
They are two separate topics. The requirements flow from the users' and 
service providers' needs. The issues flow from a technical analysis of 
the operation of the available protocols.

As to time allocation, I'd suggest that the scenarios should have 
somewhat less time, 15 minutes at most, unless we are going to present 
lower-priority scenarios at a detailed level. The extra time should be 
shifted to the discussion slot.

On 10/06/2011 2:53 AM, [e-mail] wrote:
> Hi Tina, all,
>
> I would propose to keep one single slot to discuss the issues and requirements.
>
> Furthermore, a slot to present the scope (http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jaclee-behave-v4v6-mcast-ps-02#section-2.1) and the list of work items should be added (see http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jaclee-behave-v4v6-mcast-ps-02#section-5)
>
> Cheers,
> Med
>
>
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]] De la part de Tina Tsou
> Envoyé : mardi 7 juin 2011 00:06
> À : [e-mail]
> Cc : 'Jari Arkko'
> Objet : Re: [multrans] Draft Multrans BoF request
>
> Hi all,
> A small nit,
> .	Requirements and issues (TBD, 15 min)
> should be
> .	Requirements (TBD, 15 min)
>
> It is updated below.
>
> In current deployments, the IP multicast forwarding scheme is used by many
> providers to deliver some services, such as live TV broadcasting.
> Transition to IPv6 raises issues and corresponding requirements. In
> particular, IPv4 service continuity is an essential requirement from a
> business perspective.
> This specifically includes continued receiver access to IPv4-formatted
> contents even when the assignment of a dedicated global IPv4 address to the
> receiver is no longer possible and even after the receivers have migrated to
> IPv6.
> Likewise, the delivery of IPv6-formatted contents to IPv4 receivers must
> also be possible.
> Multicast transition scenarios include the ability to access IPv4-formatted
> multicast contents from an IPv4 receiver over an IPv6-only network and the
> ability to access IPv4-formatted multicast contents from an IPv6-only
> receiver.
> The aforementioned issues can be classified into:
> .	Multicast group and source discovery procedures
> .	Multicast group subscription procedures
> .	Multicast tree computation
> .	Required IPv4-IPv6 multicast inter-working functions
> The proposed BoF session aims at discussing and hopefully validating the
> need for the IETF to work on these issues.
> The proposed agenda for the BoF session goes like this:
> .	Welcome introduction and agenda bashing (chairs, 10 min)
> .	Multicast transition scenarios (TBD, 20 min)
> .	Requirements (TBD, 15 min)
> .	Issues (TBD, 15 min)
> .	Discussion (all, 20 min)
> .	Conclusion and next steps (chairs, ADs, 10 min)
> Reading material:
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jaclee-behave-v4v6-mcast-ps-02"
>
> BoF chairs should include one rep from the service provider's community.
>
>
> We keep our promises with one another - no matter what!
>
> Best Regards,
> Tina TSOU
> http://tinatsou.weebly.com/contact.html
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> multrans mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/multrans
> _______________________________________________
> multrans mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/multrans
>
>