IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [multrans] Issues charts for presentation at the BoF

"Lee, Yiu" <Yiu_Lee@Cable.Comcast.com> Mon, 27 June 2011 23:01 UTC

Return-Path: <yiu_lee@cable.comcast.com>
X-Original-To: multrans@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: multrans@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8850311E808D for <multrans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 16:01:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.735
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.735 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ex3pipukpkrX for <multrans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 16:01:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cable.comcast.com (copdcimo01.potomac.co.ndcwest.comcast.net [76.96.32.251]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBCF01F0C49 for <multrans@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 16:00:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ([24.40.55.40]) by copdcimo01.cable.comcast.com with ESMTP with TLS id 5503630.42465938; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 17:03:49 -0600
Received: from PACDCEXMB05.cable.comcast.com ([fe80::a5b0:e5c4:df1b:2367]) by pacdcexhub03.cable.comcast.com ([fe80::d1dd:b302:b617:3755%12]) with mapi id 14.01.0289.001; Mon, 27 Jun 2011 18:59:58 -0400
From: "Lee, Yiu" <Yiu_Lee@Cable.Comcast.com>
To: Dan Wing <dwing@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: [multrans] Issues charts for presentation at the BoF
Thread-Index: AQHMNQbIdRJOsqr+NUOnbuSZ3uW+BJTSDHIA///FYHg=
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 22:59:58 +0000
Message-ID: <A2B9C57A-523D-47C3-87B0-0FC73F9A32AC@Cable.Comcast.com>
References: <BLU0-SMTP581602B6944276BA936378D8570@phx.gbl>, <091301cc3519$bb3ddd30$31b99790$@com>
In-Reply-To: <091301cc3519$bb3ddd30$31b99790$@com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: Multicast Transition <multrans@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [multrans] Issues charts for presentation at the BoF
X-BeenThere: multrans@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discuss the work of IPv4-IPv6 multicast." <multrans.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/multrans>, <mailto:multrans-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/multrans>
List-Post: <mailto:multrans@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:multrans-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/multrans>, <mailto:multrans-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 23:01:54 -0000

The undesirable scenario is building two MDT for the same content. The desirable scenario could be building a MDT with IPvX and translate to IPvY at the edge.

On Jun 27, 2011, at 18:29, "Dan Wing" <dwing@cisco.com> wrote:

> slide 10:  regarding the point: "Hence operating source in dual stack 
> mode is undesirable", can you make a diagram showing examples of the 
> desired architecture and the undesired architecture?

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email