[multrans] Something I forgot to speak to the mic

Tina TSOU <Tina.Tsou.Zouting@huawei.com> Sat, 19 November 2011 23:29 UTC

Return-Path: <Tina.Tsou.Zouting@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: multrans@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: multrans@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB4F521F858C for <multrans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 19 Nov 2011 15:29:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.43
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.43 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.675, BAYES_50=0.001, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NjhZ1qaFk-Ma for <multrans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 19 Nov 2011 15:29:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from szxga03-in.huawei.com (unknown [58.251.152.66]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2E1B21F8586 for <multrans@ietf.org>; Sat, 19 Nov 2011 15:29:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from huawei.com (szxga03-in [172.24.2.9]) by szxga03-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0LUX00K1HL8763@szxga03-in.huawei.com> for multrans@ietf.org; Sun, 20 Nov 2011 07:28:55 +0800 (CST)
Received: from szxrg01-dlp.huawei.com ([172.24.2.119]) by szxga03-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0LUX009K4L87MH@szxga03-in.huawei.com> for multrans@ietf.org; Sun, 20 Nov 2011 07:28:55 +0800 (CST)
Received: from szxeml208-edg.china.huawei.com ([172.24.2.119]) by szxrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.1.9-GA) with ESMTP id AFF06792; Sun, 20 Nov 2011 07:28:32 +0800
Received: from SZXEML410-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.137) by szxeml208-edg.china.huawei.com (172.24.2.60) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Sun, 20 Nov 2011 07:28:21 +0800
Received: from SZXEML526-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.7.40]) by szxeml410-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.82.67.137]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.003; Sun, 20 Nov 2011 07:28:24 +0800
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2011 23:28:23 +0000
From: Tina TSOU <Tina.Tsou.Zouting@huawei.com>
X-Originating-IP: [10.212.244.23]
To: "multrans@ietf.org" <multrans@ietf.org>
Message-id: <C0E0A32284495243BDE0AC8A066631A80C1F21BC@szxeml526-mbs.china.huawei.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-language: en-US
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Thread-topic: Something I forgot to speak to the mic
Thread-index: AcynEuqgyvtLJqTaTy2EwshREX/98Q==
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-cr-hashedpuzzle: AG2t APD8 BEm4 CJex DJNy Dl4Q EVhE E19G FywN GFts GYN/ Gvun HONu IOP7 Iyzj I+vd; 1; bQB1AGwAdAByAGEAbgBzAEAAaQBlAHQAZgAuAG8AcgBnAA==; Sosha1_v1; 7; {952DFC45-0511-4C55-B979-F9A7F5DFA007}; dABpAG4AYQAuAHQAcwBvAHUALgB6AG8AdQB0AGkAbgBnAEAAaAB1AGEAdwBlAGkALgBjAG8AbQA=; Sat, 19 Nov 2011 23:28:18 GMT; UwBvAG0AZQB0AGgAaQBuAGcAIABJACAAZgBvAHIAZwBvAHQAIAB0AG8AIABzAHAAZQBhAGsAIAB0AG8AIAB0AGgAZQAgAG0AaQBjAA==
x-cr-puzzleid: {952DFC45-0511-4C55-B979-F9A7F5DFA007}
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Subject: [multrans] Something I forgot to speak to the mic
X-BeenThere: multrans@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discuss the work of IPv4-IPv6 multicast." <multrans.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/multrans>, <mailto:multrans-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/multrans>
List-Post: <mailto:multrans@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:multrans-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/multrans>, <mailto:multrans-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2011 23:29:02 -0000

Hi all,
There is something I forgot to speak to the mic.
Through the discussion in the BoF, it is clear that it is more or less translation + ops.
Why should it be done in SOFTWIRE which is encapsulation? Multrans doesn't step onto softwire's toes.
It also doesn't step onto MBONED's toes as well. One set of technology can do its own ops, not have to send it to separate ops WG. For example, in this meeting, IETF decides CGN MIB is done in WG behave, not WG Opsawg.
Anyway, I'm ready to contribute to futhur technical drafts.



Best Regards,
Tina TSOU
http://tinatsou.weebly.com/contact.html