[multrans] Architecture as part of the analysis in section 4 of the Problem Statement

Tom Taylor <tom111.taylor@bell.net> Thu, 21 April 2011 03:31 UTC

Return-Path: <tom111.taylor@bell.net>
X-Original-To: multrans@ietfc.amsl.com
Delivered-To: multrans@ietfc.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EC2CE0834 for <multrans@ietfc.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 20:31:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.373
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.373 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.423, BAYES_00=-2.599, MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER=0.803, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([208.66.40.236]) by localhost (ietfc.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sYD4vgUTpeQN for <multrans@ietfc.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 20:31:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from blu0-omc4-s34.blu0.hotmail.com (blu0-omc4-s34.blu0.hotmail.com [65.55.111.173]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94EF5E0833 for <multrans@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 20:31:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from BLU0-SMTP18 ([65.55.111.135]) by blu0-omc4-s34.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 20 Apr 2011 20:31:45 -0700
X-Originating-IP: [64.231.151.226]
X-Originating-Email: [tom111.taylor@bell.net]
Message-ID: <BLU0-SMTP18DB5FCC1F28FBB2606AE2D8920@phx.gbl>
Received: from [192.168.2.17] ([64.231.151.226]) by BLU0-SMTP18.blu0.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 20 Apr 2011 20:31:44 -0700
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 23:31:44 -0400
From: Tom Taylor <tom111.taylor@bell.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Thunderbird/3.1.9
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: 'BOUCADAIR Mohamed NCPI/NAD/TIP' <mohamed.boucadair@orange-ftgroup.com>, multrans@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Apr 2011 03:31:45.0022 (UTC) FILETIME=[A36DC1E0:01CBFFD4]
Subject: [multrans] Architecture as part of the analysis in section 4 of the Problem Statement
X-BeenThere: multrans@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discuss the work of IPv4-IPv6 multicast." <multrans.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/multrans>, <mailto:multrans-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/multrans>
List-Post: <mailto:multrans@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:multrans-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/multrans>, <mailto:multrans-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 03:31:46 -0000

Could I suggest that we present a basic architecture for each of the 
three functions (acquisition, control signalling, distribution) in our 
analysis. For instance (to use an example I'm not really sure of, so 
I'll be happy to be corrected), address acquisition begins with the 
receiver and the channel list server, I think. The receiver uses some 
sort of signalling to the channel list server to acquire the <S, G> pair 
for the desired channel. First thing we have to do is identify the 
functions along the way that carry the request from the receiver to the 
channel list server.

Next problem: does the <S, G> supplied by the channel list server match 
the IP version supported by the receiver? If so, no problem. If not, 
some function has to translate the addresses. Where should that function 
be located, and where does it get the new addresses from? This gets 
nuanced by whether the access network is running the same IP version as 
the receiver. If it is, the original <S, G> version has to be recovered 
somewhere in the middle of the path in the control signalling stage. How 
is that going to happen?

Lots of fruitful lines of enquiry there, all shaped about a basic 
architecture that starts with two entities and ends up needing more.

One thing the present version of the Problem Statement is missing is 
what could be a mapping/translation function (in some possible 
solutions) or a coordination function (e.g. the one used in Dr. Xu's 
draft for directing ASM traffic through the transit network) in other 
possible solutions. Perhaps you assumed it was part of the interworking 
functions that have been identified, but you really need it for address 
acquisition and content distribution too.

If you want me to send detailed text to show what I'm talking about, let 
me know.

Tom Taylor