Re: [multrans] List of work items
Tom Taylor <tom111.taylor@bell.net> Fri, 22 July 2011 19:42 UTC
Return-Path: <tom111.taylor@bell.net>
X-Original-To: multrans@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: multrans@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 0BEA121F891F for <multrans@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Fri, 22 Jul 2011 12:42:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.442
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.442 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.354,
BAYES_00=-2.599, MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER=0.803, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d5+tXucPVuR3 for
<multrans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 12:42:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from blu0-omc4-s1.blu0.hotmail.com (blu0-omc4-s1.blu0.hotmail.com
[65.55.111.140]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B6A421F88E5 for
<multrans@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 12:42:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from BLU0-SMTP57 ([65.55.111.135]) by blu0-omc4-s1.blu0.hotmail.com
with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Fri, 22 Jul 2011 12:42:01 -0700
X-Originating-IP: [65.94.104.44]
X-Originating-Email: [tom111.taylor@bell.net]
Message-ID: <BLU0-SMTP576D6EAB2E61B66C7FA944D84E0@phx.gbl>
Received: from [192.168.2.17] ([65.94.104.44]) by BLU0-SMTP57.phx.gbl over TLS
secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675);
Fri, 22 Jul 2011 12:42:00 -0700
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 15:41:58 -0400
From: Tom Taylor <tom111.taylor@bell.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;
rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Yiqun Cai <ycai@cisco.com>
References: <CA4E54C1.ADC9A%ycai@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA4E54C1.ADC9A%ycai@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Jul 2011 19:42:00.0683 (UTC)
FILETIME=[6CABABB0:01CC48A7]
Cc: Multicast Transition <multrans@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [multrans] List of work items
X-BeenThere: multrans@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discuss the work of IPv4-IPv6 multicast." <multrans.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/multrans>,
<mailto:multrans-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/multrans>
List-Post: <mailto:multrans@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:multrans-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/multrans>,
<mailto:multrans-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 19:42:02 -0000
My personal view of the allocation of effort would be as follows: MULTRANS: Problem statement, architecture, applicability statements (with Softwires and maybe Behave looking over our shoulders, depending on which transition mechanisms we document). I could see the possibility of some protocol development in MULTRANS, but not in the initial effort. I think there might be two waves of effort here, starting with the restrictions in the current version of the Problem Statement and then relaxing some of them (allowing a mixture of IPv4 and IPv6 endpoints which can be both sources and receivers). I'm not sure if the MIB work should be done here as a separate work item or tied into the applicability statements. PIM: new IGMP/MLD/PIM interworking specifications. BEHAVE: the multicast equivalent to RFC 6052. Jacni and I have already disagreed on how the application to DS-Lite gets documented. I've drawn up an initial version of the multicast transition architecture document as I see it, and hope to get it on the table in the next few days so people can see what I have in mind. That document can make key contributions in discussion of operations and mangement and security issues associated with multicast transition. On 22/07/2011 1:12 AM, Yiqun Cai wrote: > Tina, > > I would like to suggest that you provide some reasoning and give some advice > on what piece of work is best done in softwire, behave or multrans (if it > becomes a working group). I am sure this discussion will come up and it > will be lively. > > Thanks. > > P.S., I would like to make the same comment for Tom too. > > > On 7/21/11 9:21 PM, "Tina TSOU"<Tina.Tsou.Zouting@huawei.com> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> Attached is the presentation of List of work items. >> Comments are welcome. >> >> >> Best Regards, >> Tina TSOU >> http://tinatsou.weebly.com/contact.html >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> multrans mailing list >> multrans@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/multrans > >
- [multrans] List of work items Tina TSOU
- Re: [multrans] List of work items Yiqun Cai
- Re: [multrans] List of work items Tina TSOU
- Re: [multrans] List of work items Jacni Qin
- Re: [multrans] List of work items Tom Taylor