Re: [multrans] Clarification question about Problem Statement and Use Cases draft
"Lee, Yiu" <Yiu_Lee@Cable.Comcast.com> Tue, 23 August 2011 07:59 UTC
Return-Path: <yiu_lee@cable.comcast.com>
X-Original-To: multrans@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: multrans@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id F0DAF21F8B27 for <multrans@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Tue, 23 Aug 2011 00:59:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.525
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.525 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.185,
BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_MODEMCABLE=0.768, HOST_EQ_MODEMCABLE=1.368,
MIME_BASE64_TEXT=1.753, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZNkimwN+dIt1 for
<multrans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Aug 2011 00:59:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pacdcimo01.cable.comcast.com (PacdcIMO01.cable.comcast.com
[24.40.8.145]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B87F921F8B20 for
<multrans@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Aug 2011 00:59:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ([24.40.55.40]) by pacdcimo01.cable.comcast.com with ESMTP with
TLS id 5503620.137935330; Tue, 23 Aug 2011 04:00:58 -0400
Received: from PACDCEXMB05.cable.comcast.com ([fe80::a5b0:e5c4:df1b:2367]) by
pacdcexhub03.cable.comcast.com ([fe80::d1dd:b302:b617:3755%11]) with mapi id
14.01.0289.001; Tue, 23 Aug 2011 04:00:58 -0400
From: "Lee, Yiu" <Yiu_Lee@Cable.Comcast.com>
To: Maglione Roberta <roberta.maglione@telecomitalia.it>
Thread-Topic: [multrans] Clarification question about Problem Statement and
Use Cases draft
Thread-Index: AcxhaRlrFggMTacCSO21470vfvxz1wAIl/eAAAhXTLD//77qAA==
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 08:00:56 +0000
Message-ID: <379B24BA-08AB-45A4-BD97-311A91225B04@Cable.Comcast.com>
References: <282BBE8A501E1F4DA9C775F964BB21FE3EB5E53D91@GRFMBX704BA020.griffon.local>
<78E58E38-F5AC-4A1C-BD16-A11BF9633203@Cable.Comcast.com>
<282BBE8A501E1F4DA9C775F964BB21FE3EB5E53D92@GRFMBX704BA020.griffon.local>
In-Reply-To: <282BBE8A501E1F4DA9C775F964BB21FE3EB5E53D92@GRFMBX704BA020.griffon.local>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312"
Content-ID: <7BE84CAB564E1C4FA728BAE3DA54A650@cable.comcast.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "multrans@ietf.org" <multrans@ietf.org>,
Ullio Mario <mario.ullio@telecomitalia.it>
Subject: Re: [multrans] Clarification question about Problem Statement and
Use Cases draft
X-BeenThere: multrans@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discuss the work of IPv4-IPv6 multicast." <multrans.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/multrans>,
<mailto:multrans-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/multrans>
List-Post: <mailto:multrans@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:multrans-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/multrans>,
<mailto:multrans-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 07:59:55 -0000
Hi Roberta, We did think about it. For the PS and usecase, we can include this. To prioritize the work, do you see this high priority to address? Thanks, Yiu On Aug 23, 2011, at 3:57 AM, "Maglione Roberta" <roberta.maglione@telecomitalia.it > wrote: > Hi Yiu, > Yes, correct. > Thanks > Roberta > > -----Original Message----- > From: Lee, Yiu [mailto:Yiu_Lee@Cable.Comcast.com] > Sent: martedì 23 agosto 2011 9.55 > To: Maglione Roberta > Cc: multrans@ietf.org; Ullio Mario > Subject: Re: [multrans] Clarification question about Problem > Statement and Use Cases draft > > Hi Roberta, > > So you refer to S6-N4-R6 case? > > Regards, > Yiu > > > > On Aug 23, 2011, at 3:48 AM, "Maglione Roberta" <roberta.maglione@telecomitalia.it >> wrote: > >> In my opinion "IPv6 Receiver and Source Connected to an IPv4-Only >> Network" use case could also cover the scenario where both receivers >> and source are IPv6 and they get IPv6 unicast connectivity from an >> IPv4 network by using 6PE solution (for unicast traffic). >> If I am not wrong this use case does not belong to behave >> discussion, but I believe that having a multicast equivalent >> solution for 6PE may be useful for a Service Provider that would >> like to start offering IPv6 multicast keeping his own backbone >> network in IPv4. >> >> I would appreciate your comments. >> Thanks, >> Best regards, >> Roberta >> >> >> Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente >> alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione >> derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente >> vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete >> cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e >> di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. >> >> This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain >> privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. >> Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is >> unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete >> this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e- >> mail, Thanks. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> multrans mailing list >> multrans@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/multrans > > Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente > alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione > derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente > vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete > cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e > di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. > > This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain > privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. > Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is > unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete > this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e- > mail, Thanks. >
- [multrans] Clarification question about Problem S… Maglione Roberta
- Re: [multrans] Clarification question about Probl… Lee, Yiu
- Re: [multrans] Clarification question about Probl… Maglione Roberta
- Re: [multrans] Clarification question about Probl… Lee, Yiu
- Re: [multrans] Clarification question about Probl… Maglione Roberta
- Re: [multrans] Clarification question about Probl… Tina TSOU
- Re: [multrans] Clarification question about Probl… Lee, Yiu
- Re: [multrans] Clarification question about Probl… Greg Shepherd