Re: [multrans] link to meeting slides for multrans BoF

Jacni Qin <jacni@jacni.com> Tue, 15 November 2011 01:19 UTC

Return-Path: <jacni@jacni.com>
X-Original-To: multrans@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: multrans@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A5331F0CCA for <multrans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 17:19:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.772
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.772 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.104, BAYES_00=-2.599, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB=0.619]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UakNEZL8svgt for <multrans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 17:19:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from srv05.olivemail.cn (mx100.vip.olivemail.net [74.82.185.218]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB67E1F0C7D for <multrans@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 17:19:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from srv01.olivemail.cn (unknown [202.105.21.229]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by srv05.olivemail.cn (Olivemail) with ESMTPS id B3E6E3800D4 for <multrans@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 20:19:02 -0500 (EST)
Received: from oray.cn (unknown [202.105.21.248]) by srv01.olivemail.cn (Olivemail) with ESMTP id 71D4B340099 for <multrans@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 09:18:59 +0800 (CST)
Received: from [172.18.171.158] (unknown [221.11.61.15]) by app (Coremail) with SMTP id +AWowJB7BQr3vcFOcXILAA--.11400S2; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 09:18:56 +0800 (CST)
Message-ID: <4EC1BE75.6050003@jacni.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 09:20:53 +0800
From: Jacni Qin <jacni@jacni.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Qiong <bingxuere@gmail.com>
References: <CAH3bfABizCzWCoTZ7sP6f2V2QbR=TKZPaTpMpxv0QOJxVfD0FQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAH3bfABizCzWCoTZ7sP6f2V2QbR=TKZPaTpMpxv0QOJxVfD0FQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------020803060200030407000405"
X-CM-TRANSID: +AWowJB7BQr3vcFOcXILAA--.11400S2
X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjvdXoW7Xw1DJF4kWF45CFWfCryxuFg_yoWfJrb_Gr 4kZry8Gw18AayxKrsrtrZ0yr1fZw1jgw1xAa4DC3yxur1Skr1ftrn5Kr90q34fKFWUtr9r Xr1fKryUCF4a9jkaLaAFLSUrUUUUUb8apTn2vfkv8UJUUUU8Yxn0WfASr-VFAUDa7-sFnT 9fnUUIcSsGvfJTRUUUjz8YjxAI6xkYrwAYjxAI6xCIbckI1I0E57IF64kEYxAxM7k0a2IF 6F1UM7kC6x804xWl1xkIjI8I6I8E6xAIw20EY4v20xvaj40_Wr0E3s1ln4vEF7Iv6F18KV Aqrcv_GVWUtr1rJF1ln4vE4IxY62xKV4CY8xCE548m6r4UJryUGwAawVCIc40E5I027xCE 548m6r1DJr4UtwAa7VCY0VAaVVAqrcv_Jw1UWr13McIj6xIIjxv20xvE14v26r1j6r18Mc Ij6I8E87Iv67AKxVWUJVW8JwACjcxG0xvEwIxGrwCjr7xvwVCIw2I0I7xG6c02F41lc7I2 V7IY0VAS07AlzVAYIcxG8wCF04k20xvY0x0EwIxGrwCFI7vE0wC2zVAF1VAY17CE14v26r 1Y6r17MIIYrxkI7VAKI48JYxBIdaVFxhVjvjDU0xZFpf9x07jgcTQUUUUU=
X-CM-SenderInfo: xmdf0xo6mdu03lof0z/1tbiAQAMEko7lPRGLwAhsG
Cc: multrans@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [multrans] link to meeting slides for multrans BoF
X-BeenThere: multrans@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discuss the work of IPv4-IPv6 multicast." <multrans.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/multrans>, <mailto:multrans-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/multrans>
List-Post: <mailto:multrans@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:multrans-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/multrans>, <mailto:multrans-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 01:19:04 -0000

Re-,

Sorry, I'm confused.
Anyway, IMHO the transition use case won't be that complex, like "... 
-6-4-6-4-6-4-X-X- ..."
The "X-Y" and "X-Y-X" are more than sufficient for the current discussion.


Cheers,
Jacni


On 11/14/2011 10:37 PM, Qiong wrote:
>
> Hi Jacni,
>
> In our use case, the IPv4 access network means layer2 network, which 
> possibly do not support MLD snooping.
>
> Best regards
>
> Qiong
>
>
> *From:* Jacni Qin [mailto:jacni@jacni.com <mailto:jacni@jacni.com>]
> *Sent:* Monday, November 14, 2011 9:06 AM
> *To:* Tina TSOU
> *Cc:* multrans@ietf.org <mailto:multrans@ietf.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [multrans] link to meeting slides for multrans BoF
>
> hi,
>
> In multran-1, about the "IPv4 Access Network (not mcast capable)", do 
> you mean Layer2 or Layer3?
>
>
> Cheers,
> Jacni
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> multrans mailing list
> multrans@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/multrans