Re: [multrans] Issues charts for presentation at the BoF

hi,

Also the ASM-SSM issue, but to keep the slides simple, I don't want to add
more text about this point.
More information can be found in the PS, and we can disscuss that during the
presentation if there is any interest.

Cheers,
Jacni

On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 6:46 AM, Tina Tsou <tena@huawei.com> wrote:

> Jacni,****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> We keep our promises with one another – no matter what!****
>
> ** **
>
> Best Regards,****
>
> Tina TSOU****
>
> http://tinatsou.weebly.com/contact.html****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* multrans-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:multrans-bounces@ietf.org] *On
> Behalf Of *Jacni Qin
> *Sent:* Monday, June 27, 2011 6:28 PM
> *To:* Dan Wing
> *Cc:* Multicast Transition
> *Subject:* Re: [multrans] Issues charts for presentation at the BoF****
>
> ** **
>
> Dan,****
>
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 6:29 AM, Dan Wing <dwing@cisco.com> wrote:****
>
>
>
> slide 6: for IPv4, does "IGMP" encompass IGMPv1, v2, and v3?  That is,
> the list of interworking issues may be greater than described.****
>
>
> Jacni>: Yes, for example, one case of the interworking function IGMPv2 -
> MLDv2
> [Tina: what’s your proposed text here?]****
>
>
> Cheers,
> Jacni****
>
>
> slide 10:  regarding the point: "Hence operating source in dual stack
> mode is undesirable", can you make a diagram showing examples of the
> desired architecture and the undesired architecture?
>
> -d****
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> multrans mailing list
> multrans@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/multrans****
>
> ** **
>