Re: [multrans] Updated Issues Presentation

Let me counter-offer a view, that the problem statement text should be 
updated to make the roles of translation and tunneling clearer, rather 
than hiding it all under the "interworking" term.

Thinking more about the contents of slide 9, I realize that tunneling of 
multicast signalling between multicast routers will only make sense in 
special situations and is an issue of network design rather than a topic 
within the scope of multicast transition. So the second half of slide 9 
applies primarily to the transport of multicast content. The 
architecture document proposed as a work item could cover the use of 
encapsulation in general, and one of the applicability work items would 
be to describe the application of the architecture to DS-lite.

On 30/06/2011 3:14 AM, Jacni Qin wrote:
> Thanks for the updates,
>
> For page 9 Encapsulation, please check again my previous comments and
> proposed text.
> And I guess the issue currently listed applies not only to encapsulation
> case, but to the translation as well.
>
>
> Cheers,
> Jacni
>
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 11:39 AM, Tom Taylor<tom111.taylor@bell.net>  wrote:
>
>> Here's an update to our issues slides. We've tried to responsive to the
>> comments. Thanks to Joel, Dan, and Jacni.
>>
>> Tom Taylor
>> Cathy Zhou
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> multrans mailing list
>> multrans@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/multrans
>>
>>
>