IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [multrans] Updated Issues Presentation

"Lee, Yiu" <Yiu_Lee@Cable.Comcast.com> Sat, 02 July 2011 20:58 UTC

Return-Path: <yiu_lee@cable.comcast.com>
X-Original-To: multrans@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: multrans@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAE3511E80DE for <multrans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 2 Jul 2011 13:58:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=3.364, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_MODEMCABLE=0.768, HOST_EQ_MODEMCABLE=1.368, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jxOBHfvQ9val for <multrans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 2 Jul 2011 13:58:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pacdcimo01.cable.comcast.com (PacdcIMO01.cable.comcast.com [24.40.8.145]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28E3F11E8082 for <multrans@ietf.org>; Sat, 2 Jul 2011 13:58:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ([24.40.55.41]) by pacdcimo01.cable.comcast.com with ESMTP with TLS id 5503620.133011674; Sat, 02 Jul 2011 16:58:43 -0400
Received: from PACDCEXMB05.cable.comcast.com ([fe80::a5b0:e5c4:df1b:2367]) by PACDCEXHUB02.cable.comcast.com ([fe80::11d4:f530:37a0:9f4e%12]) with mapi id 14.01.0289.001; Sat, 2 Jul 2011 16:58:43 -0400
From: "Lee, Yiu" <Yiu_Lee@Cable.Comcast.com>
To: Tom Taylor <tom111.taylor@bell.net>
Thread-Topic: [multrans] Updated Issues Presentation
Thread-Index: AQHMOPR6Tg+OqN/zc0CZ82XuCVJMCJTZxcQA//+99gA=
Date: Sat, 2 Jul 2011 20:58:42 +0000
Message-ID: <CA34FE20.114C0%yiu_lee@cable.comcast.com>
In-Reply-To: <BLU0-SMTP31C561DE7C1AB64BDAAA53D85A0@phx.gbl>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.12.0.110505
x-originating-ip: [24.40.55.71]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <E520F778B07BD74EBB6E7461E6627D07@cable.comcast.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "multrans@ietf.org" <multrans@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [multrans] Updated Issues Presentation
X-BeenThere: multrans@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discuss the work of IPv4-IPv6 multicast." <multrans.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/multrans>, <mailto:multrans-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/multrans>
List-Post: <mailto:multrans@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:multrans-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/multrans>, <mailto:multrans-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Jul 2011 20:58:48 -0000

Hi Tom,

>[PTT] Is it worth qualifying the statement (other than during the oral
>presentation)? I will be updating to say that encapsulation applies only
>to content except in a transit network.

Perhaps, you can soften the tone to "may". I just tried to avoid people
challenging that statement.

>>
>> On P.11, the LHS diagram isn't really a dual-stack network.
>
>[PTT] It might be operating as one for unicast traffic. Should I say it
>is a dual-stack-capable network being operated as (e.g) ...?
>                 ^^^^^^^

I tried to understand the purpose of that page. My understanding is
whether it is a dual-stack network or not, if we want to optimize the
network to only carry the content once, it would require some effort.

Cheers,
Yiu

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email