Re: [multrans] Issues charts for presentation at the BoF

Whatever

On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Tina Tsou <tena@huawei.com> wrote:

> Hi Jacni,****
>
> As the co-author of the problem statement I-D, I understand your point.
> Proposing alternative text will help people understanding you better. If
> there is no alternative text, we will know it is just side comment, no
> change is needed for the time being.****
>
> ** **
>
> There are other presentations for the BoF. Hopefully they will also come
> to the mailing list soon.****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> We keep our promises with one another – no matter what!****
>
> ** **
>
> Best Regards,****
>
> Tina TSOU****
>
> http://tinatsou.weebly.com/contact.html****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Jacni Qin [mailto:jacniq@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, June 28, 2011 7:46 PM
> *To:* Tina Tsou
> *Cc:* Dan Wing; Multicast Transition
>
> *Subject:* Re: [multrans] Issues charts for presentation at the BoF****
>
> ** **
>
> hi,
>
> Also the ASM-SSM issue, but to keep the slides simple, I don't want to add
> more text about this point.
> More information can be found in the PS, and we can disscuss that during
> the presentation if there is any interest.
>
>
> Cheers,
> Jacni ****
>
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 6:46 AM, Tina Tsou <tena@huawei.com> wrote:****
>
> Jacni,****
>
>  ****
>
>  ****
>
> We keep our promises with one another – no matter what!****
>
>  ****
>
> Best Regards,****
>
> Tina TSOU****
>
> http://tinatsou.weebly.com/contact.html****
>
>  ****
>
> *From:* multrans-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:multrans-bounces@ietf.org] *On
> Behalf Of *Jacni Qin
> *Sent:* Monday, June 27, 2011 6:28 PM
> *To:* Dan Wing
> *Cc:* Multicast Transition
> *Subject:* Re: [multrans] Issues charts for presentation at the BoF****
>
>  ****
>
> Dan,****
>
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 6:29 AM, Dan Wing <dwing@cisco.com> wrote:****
>
>
>
> slide 6: for IPv4, does "IGMP" encompass IGMPv1, v2, and v3?  That is,
> the list of interworking issues may be greater than described.****
>
> ** **
>
> Jacni>: Yes, for example, one case of the interworking function IGMPv2 -
> MLDv2****
>
> [Tina: what’s your proposed text here?]****
>
>
> Cheers,
> Jacni****
>
>
> slide 10:  regarding the point: "Hence operating source in dual stack
> mode is undesirable", can you make a diagram showing examples of the
> desired architecture and the undesired architecture?
>
> -d****
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> multrans mailing list
> multrans@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/multrans****
>
>  ****
>
> ** **
>