Re: [multrans] Issues charts for presentation at the BoF

Tina Tsou <tena@huawei.com> Tue, 28 June 2011 22:46 UTC

Return-Path: <tena@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: multrans@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: multrans@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F28DB11E81EE for <multrans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 15:46:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.001, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tnXMPmZ9K1AB for <multrans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 15:46:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from usaga04-in.huawei.com (usaga04-in.huawei.com [206.16.17.180]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC97311E8148 for <multrans@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 15:46:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (usaga04-in [172.18.4.101]) by usaga04-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0LNI0021QV8RF8@usaga04-in.huawei.com> for multrans@ietf.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 17:46:03 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from TingZousc1 ([10.193.34.119]) by usaga04-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0LNI00E0FV8P2J@usaga04-in.huawei.com> for multrans@ietf.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 17:46:03 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 15:46:01 -0700
From: Tina Tsou <tena@huawei.com>
In-reply-to: <BANLkTi=UHSJYsGnCrPzE293xKZ0HkujZRg@mail.gmail.com>
To: 'Jacni Qin' <jacniq@gmail.com>, 'Dan Wing' <dwing@cisco.com>
Message-id: <02ff01cc35e5$286f2fa0$794d8ee0$@com>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_ncDqzF5mCW8PAGUL444jzg)"
Content-language: en-us
Thread-index: Acw1MqY0IUDh0djkRkOh/WprCaqmjQAsmnhA
References: <BLU0-SMTP581602B6944276BA936378D8570@phx.gbl> <091301cc3519$bb3ddd30$31b99790$@com> <BANLkTi=UHSJYsGnCrPzE293xKZ0HkujZRg@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: 'Multicast Transition' <multrans@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [multrans] Issues charts for presentation at the BoF
X-BeenThere: multrans@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discuss the work of IPv4-IPv6 multicast." <multrans.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/multrans>, <mailto:multrans-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/multrans>
List-Post: <mailto:multrans@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:multrans-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/multrans>, <mailto:multrans-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 22:46:06 -0000

Jacni,
 
 
We keep our promises with one another - no matter what!
 
Best Regards,
Tina TSOU
http://tinatsou.weebly.com/contact.html
 
From: multrans-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:multrans-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
Of Jacni Qin
Sent: Monday, June 27, 2011 6:28 PM
To: Dan Wing
Cc: Multicast Transition
Subject: Re: [multrans] Issues charts for presentation at the BoF
 
Dan,
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 6:29 AM, Dan Wing <dwing@cisco.com> wrote:


slide 6: for IPv4, does "IGMP" encompass IGMPv1, v2, and v3?  That is,
the list of interworking issues may be greater than described.

Jacni>: Yes, for example, one case of the interworking function IGMPv2 -
MLDv2
[Tina: what's your proposed text here?]

Cheers,
Jacni

slide 10:  regarding the point: "Hence operating source in dual stack
mode is undesirable", can you make a diagram showing examples of the
desired architecture and the undesired architecture?

-d


_______________________________________________
multrans mailing list
multrans@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/multrans