[multrans] Thoughts on the content of the solution analysis (section 4)
Tom Taylor <tom111.taylor@bell.net> Wed, 11 May 2011 02:50 UTC
Return-Path: <tom111.taylor@bell.net>
X-Original-To: multrans@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: multrans@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 20E3BE06CE for <multrans@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Tue, 10 May 2011 19:50:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -98.505
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-98.505 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER=1.495, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RSkN7b82MKPz for
<multrans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 May 2011 19:50:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from blu0-omc4-s20.blu0.hotmail.com (blu0-omc4-s20.blu0.hotmail.com
[65.55.111.159]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22CA4E06A6 for
<multrans@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 May 2011 19:50:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from BLU0-SMTP67 ([65.55.111.135]) by blu0-omc4-s20.blu0.hotmail.com
with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 10 May 2011 19:50:46 -0700
X-Originating-IP: [64.231.151.226]
X-Originating-Email: [tom111.taylor@bell.net]
Message-ID: <BLU0-SMTP674BF1EC9B6E7B5376C2D1D8860@phx.gbl>
Received: from [192.168.2.17] ([64.231.151.226]) by BLU0-SMTP67.phx.gbl over
TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675);
Tue, 10 May 2011 19:50:44 -0700
Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 22:50:42 -0400
From: Tom Taylor <tom111.taylor@bell.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-GB;
rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "multrans@ietf.org" <multrans@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------030603000700020605090308"
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 May 2011 02:50:44.0821 (UTC)
FILETIME=[394BE050:01CC0F86]
Subject: [multrans] Thoughts on the content of the solution analysis (section
4)
X-BeenThere: multrans@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discuss the work of IPv4-IPv6 multicast." <multrans.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/multrans>,
<mailto:multrans-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/multrans>
List-Post: <mailto:multrans@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:multrans-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/multrans>,
<mailto:multrans-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 02:50:51 -0000
Forgive me for sending this out in presentation form, but it seemed to be the best way to express myself until I can propose text into the updated problem statement. The attached document gives a number of considerations that might fit into section 4, plus deployment scenarios that will at least illustrate those ideas and might belong in the document. I'll be interested in any reactions to the Gateway-Initiated DS Lite scenario, since it wasn't totally obvious how it worked. Hope this is useful. Tom Taylor