IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [multrans] Updated Issues Presentation

Tom Taylor <tom111.taylor@bell.net> Sat, 02 July 2011 21:03 UTC

Return-Path: <tom111.taylor@bell.net>
X-Original-To: multrans@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: multrans@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 358CE11E80DE for <multrans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 2 Jul 2011 14:03:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -100.528
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.528 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.591, BAYES_20=-0.74, MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER=0.803, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AYN-5Yx1gJkE for <multrans@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 2 Jul 2011 14:03:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from blu0-omc4-s28.blu0.hotmail.com (blu0-omc4-s28.blu0.hotmail.com [65.55.111.167]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9284A11E8082 for <multrans@ietf.org>; Sat, 2 Jul 2011 14:03:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from BLU0-SMTP92 ([65.55.111.135]) by blu0-omc4-s28.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sat, 2 Jul 2011 14:03:56 -0700
X-Originating-IP: [65.94.104.44]
X-Originating-Email: [tom111.taylor@bell.net]
Message-ID: <BLU0-SMTP92844DF30D21160D0B1A29D85A0@phx.gbl>
Received: from [192.168.2.17] ([65.94.104.44]) by BLU0-SMTP92.phx.gbl over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sat, 2 Jul 2011 14:03:55 -0700
Date: Sat, 2 Jul 2011 17:03:56 -0400
From: Tom Taylor <tom111.taylor@bell.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110616 Thunderbird/3.1.11
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Lee, Yiu" <Yiu_Lee@Cable.Comcast.com>
References: <CA34FE20.114C0%yiu_lee@cable.comcast.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA34FE20.114C0%yiu_lee@cable.comcast.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Jul 2011 21:03:56.0062 (UTC) FILETIME=[8E33FBE0:01CC38FB]
Cc: "multrans@ietf.org" <multrans@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [multrans] Updated Issues Presentation
X-BeenThere: multrans@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discuss the work of IPv4-IPv6 multicast." <multrans.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/multrans>, <mailto:multrans-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/multrans>
List-Post: <mailto:multrans@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:multrans-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/multrans>, <mailto:multrans-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Jul 2011 21:03:57 -0000

Below.

On 02/07/2011 4:58 PM, Lee, Yiu wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
>> [PTT] Is it worth qualifying the statement (other than during the oral
>> presentation)? I will be updating to say that encapsulation applies only
>> to content except in a transit network.
>
> Perhaps, you can soften the tone to "may". I just tried to avoid people
> challenging that statement.

[PTT] OK
>
>>>
>>> On P.11, the LHS diagram isn't really a dual-stack network.
>>
>> [PTT] It might be operating as one for unicast traffic. Should I say it
>> is a dual-stack-capable network being operated as (e.g) ...?
>>                  ^^^^^^^
>
> I tried to understand the purpose of that page. My understanding is
> whether it is a dual-stack network or not, if we want to optimize the
> network to only carry the content once, it would require some effort.

[PTT] Yes.
>
> Cheers,
> Yiu
>
>
>
>

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email