IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dnsext] 3007 vs 4033, 4034 and 4035

Lawrence Conroy <lconroy@insensate.co.uk> Wed, 07 December 2011 13:55 UTC

Return-Path: <dnsext-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@lists.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB03321F8C00; Wed, 7 Dec 2011 05:55:23 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1323266123; bh=/fiv8oBUscYGI+YcrD2FLJEdeJmZfQdV+MFPUzYntdQ=; h=Mime-Version:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Message-Id:References:To:Cc: Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help: List-Subscribe:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Sender; b=v/IC1wMp9IQl2iJlUrc9lTx0IIJMcYx9PUVjiQbc0Ul6Mx/OmgmgQL2cWJ/nCDR1U 45jf6ikpHrYmqIbWbS20fo3O1zmnYKQUSc6aidnXwJ6AydNwRCPAJ+RA9KKJc5ZRk/ SqObjWAkHL4xYzbaX2OLwPwQVNXK5sh51z9Ofk+U=
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B66CF21F8C00 for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Dec 2011 05:55:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.449
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.449 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.150, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7JesqgFwZaQ6 for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Dec 2011 05:55:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from insensate.co.uk (ghost.insensate.co.uk [213.152.49.121]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0027021F8BF9 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Dec 2011 05:55:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by insensate.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 594C7290DE3; Wed, 7 Dec 2011 13:55:20 +0000 (GMT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at insensate.co.uk
Received: from insensate.co.uk ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (psyche.insensate.co.uk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VvfjIs3klLV5; Wed, 7 Dec 2011 13:55:19 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by insensate.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 954ED290DD8; Wed, 7 Dec 2011 13:55:19 +0000 (GMT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
From: Lawrence Conroy <lconroy@insensate.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <a06240800cb051d0f9a98@[10.31.200.139]>
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2011 13:55:18 +0000
Message-Id: <3C110754-F1CC-4AD1-A4D1-24889EA2C9EE@insensate.co.uk>
References: <20111206221911.06FDA1925ECD@drugs.dv.isc.org> <a06240800cb051d0f9a98@[10.31.200.139]>
To: Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Cc: dnsext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dnsext] 3007 vs 4033, 4034 and 4035
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: dnsext-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: dnsext-bounces@ietf.org

Hi Ed, folks,
 C'mon. Play nice.

This question is why I'm happy that the Namedroppers list is continuing.

I trust that others who might want to raise errata can find this list to
 sanity check concerns **before** errata are raised.

Can't help saying that the potentially inconsistent state of the RFCs is
something that the WG should have fixed, and is a challenge [As you know :]p
Speaking as an outsider, Mark's question seems reasonable to me.

No -- that doesn't need a WG, but Namedroppers IS a public pool of clueful
 (if grumpy) people with DNS clue.

all the best,
  Lawrence

On 7 Dec 2011, at 13:40, Edward Lewis wrote:
> Consult this for instructions:  http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata.php
> 
> At 9:19 +1100 12/7/11, Mark Andrews wrote:
>> I believe a erratra should be filed.
> 

_______________________________________________
dnsext mailing list
dnsext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email