Re: [dnsext] WGLC: RFC6195bis IANA guidance
Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Fri, 06 July 2012 14:32 UTC
Return-Path: <dnsext-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@lists.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A5A221F85E6; Fri, 6 Jul 2012 07:32:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1341585177; bh=74o+d+5Xi9WvFnzNKKinWm2f7KxvVzG0WEBD9iF6q1w=; h=Mime-Version:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Message-Id:References:To:Cc: Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help: List-Subscribe:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Sender; b=haLh6NRCeK3Prh4681CHtnunBLMvk/etbGVY1QOTsBfuOpbkCVXeeSfpQviickDve kytHnQKM8K0p0s6kTTHzCkudUH3OBs0mNiTrE91QbmTN7sn+LGlfrL3prurf81vqc2 qq3Qf0303kF9D688+rsyz1u10FKrRHkq1ADDdGx0=
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 231FC21F85E6 for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Jul 2012 07:32:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.572
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.572 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.027, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n+tU1c2FHAdy for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Jul 2012 07:32:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hoffman.proper.com (IPv6.Hoffman.Proper.COM [IPv6:2605:8e00:100:41::81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FE9F21F85E5 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Jul 2012 07:32:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.20.30.102] (50-1-50-97.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [50.1.50.97] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by hoffman.proper.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q66EXArq017099 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 6 Jul 2012 07:33:11 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278)
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <20120706085916.AED242238832@drugs.dv.isc.org>
Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2012 07:33:10 -0700
Message-Id: <1FA458DB-1E9A-40ED-99CE-1047A0C5EDB8@vpnc.org>
References: <20120613090016.205a61dff9fc1684c258b274662bb912.d2ce8b95d9.wbe@email00.secureserver.net> <CAF4+nEGbZavii4p_km2kRik-5B2RB19wJ2TFZJ-tSbX-x=Nh6A@mail.gmail.com> <CAF4+nEHdtq2dRknB8NEasfz7THUOfpPaE7Qr189CjQpZVt5D2w@mail.gmail.com> <20120703141331.45D4D222DC10@drugs.dv.isc.org> <6AB4DF76-54EE-49A6-8F3E-BF1FA7782711@vpnc.org> <20120706085916.AED242238832@drugs.dv.isc.org>
To: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278)
Cc: IETF DNSEXT WG <dnsext@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dnsext] WGLC: RFC6195bis IANA guidance
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: dnsext-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: dnsext-bounces@ietf.org
On Jul 6, 2012, at 1:59 AM, Mark Andrews wrote: > For a expert to be able to evaluate a RR type definition it needs > to be stable. The expert reviews a stable request, yes. > No expert can say a RR type definintion can be said > to be safe / good if it is still subject to change. Then don't ask the expert to say that. Isn't this obvious? >> - Force Internet-Drafts to keep their RRtype as TBD all the way until = >> the IESG passes the Internet-Draft to the RFC Editor >> >> - Allow WGs and document authors to request RRtype assignment earlier in = >> the process and know that there might be a change based on technical = >> review of the document >> >> Pick one. Humorously, you didn't reply to this. --Paul Hoffman _______________________________________________ dnsext mailing list dnsext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext
- [dnsext] WGLC: RFC6195bis IANA guidance Olafur Gudmundsson
- Re: [dnsext] WGLC: RFC6195bis IANA guidance Michael Sheldon
- Re: [dnsext] WGLC: RFC6195bis IANA guidance Alfred Hönes
- Re: [dnsext] WGLC: RFC6195bis IANA guidance Dick Franks
- Re: [dnsext] WGLC: RFC6195bis IANA guidance Donald Eastlake
- Re: [dnsext] WGLC: RFC6195bis IANA guidance Donald Eastlake
- Re: [dnsext] WGLC: RFC6195bis IANA guidance Olafur Gudmundsson
- Re: [dnsext] WGLC: RFC6195bis IANA guidance Alfred Hönes
- Re: [dnsext] WGLC: RFC6195bis IANA guidance Donald Eastlake
- [dnsext] WGLC: RFC6195bis IANA guidance Donald Eastlake
- Re: [dnsext] WGLC: RFC6195bis IANA guidance Ray Bellis
- Re: [dnsext] WGLC: RFC6195bis IANA guidance Donald Eastlake
- Re: [dnsext] WGLC: RFC6195bis IANA guidance Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] WGLC: RFC6195bis IANA guidance Paul Hoffman
- Re: [dnsext] WGLC: RFC6195bis IANA guidance Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [dnsext] WGLC: RFC6195bis IANA guidance Donald Eastlake
- Re: [dnsext] WGLC: RFC6195bis IANA guidance Paul Hoffman
- Re: [dnsext] WGLC: RFC6195bis IANA guidance Dick Franks
- Re: [dnsext] WGLC: RFC6195bis IANA guidance Donald Eastlake
- Re: [dnsext] WGLC: RFC6195bis IANA guidance Donald Eastlake
- Re: [dnsext] WGLC: RFC6195bis IANA guidance Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [dnsext] WGLC: RFC6195bis IANA guidance Michael Sheldon
- Re: [dnsext] WGLC: RFC6195bis IANA guidance Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] WGLC: RFC6195bis IANA guidance Paul Hoffman
- Re: [dnsext] WGLC: RFC6195bis IANA guidance Chris Thompson
- Re: [dnsext] WGLC: RFC6195bis IANA guidance Donald Eastlake