Re: [dnsext] resolving IESG comments on draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-bis-updates

Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> Wed, 11 July 2012 11:59 UTC

Return-Path: <dnsext-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@lists.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C883F21F8625; Wed, 11 Jul 2012 04:59:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1342007955; bh=tlKAmCRwMuq8Qttbyt9ZAPkIRJf/VQxM1AxJktfh6/k=; h=Date:From:To:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version:In-Reply-To: Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help: List-Subscribe:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Sender; b=dCXaTgGHcXr1h0i0ss+FkqKwBQd0Ljz3kYiZ67DLArc8TPNI6gRU053KyxT+0Fb7R x9/m70qTqvEF+SvZeTH8kyCB8f0hSL9SxRsaAiLFLJTgtQIO+36heV3KPu13uuyYbA Z2zYDEG6ziBvNyPnlVLuL5q0JtBTCxrCYAd/uKjs=
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09FFE21F8625 for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Jul 2012 04:59:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.84
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.84 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_MISMATCH_INFO=1.448, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AUYGDaKHlnVG for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Jul 2012 04:59:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx1.yitter.info (ow5p.x.rootbsd.net [208.79.81.114]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B91621F8622 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Jul 2012 04:59:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.yitter.info (bas1-malton22-1167905092.dsl.bell.ca [69.156.209.68]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.yitter.info (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 43C308A031 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Jul 2012 11:59:43 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 07:59:43 -0400
From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
To: dnsext@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20120711115942.GB82178@mail.yitter.info>
References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1207100827380.30040@fledge.watson.org> <D3D58A5F-D4DF-4ECA-AE2E-09008E7FAD52@vpnc.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <D3D58A5F-D4DF-4ECA-AE2E-09008E7FAD52@vpnc.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Subject: Re: [dnsext] resolving IESG comments on draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-bis-updates
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: dnsext-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: dnsext-bounces@ietf.org

No hat.

On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 07:50:51AM -0700, Paul Hoffman wrote:

> It would be helpful to DANE and future protocols if "no answer" was
> discussed more fully. The amount of differing opinions about the
> four states *even among DNSSEC-knowledgeable people* in that thread
> and others was significant. The fact that "bogus" is defined
> differently in different DNSSEC documents didn't help us come to
> conclusion, either.

Although I agree with this, I thought the difference between the docs
was explained by the different perspectives the documents were working
from?

Best,

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs@anvilwalrusden.com
_______________________________________________
dnsext mailing list
dnsext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext