Re: [dnsext] 3007 vs 4033, 4034 and 4035
Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz> Wed, 07 December 2011 13:40 UTC
Return-Path: <dnsext-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@lists.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com
(Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F4DD21F8B9C; Wed, 7 Dec 2011 05:40:18 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1;
t=1323265218; bh=7EYYHYaqQ5KnV2JW5QTrOk3YFewK2BmoTMHXErff/Lg=;
h=Mime-Version:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References:Date:To:From:Cc: Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:
List-Subscribe:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Sender;
b=IhgDso6yhCxcL1SIasZIG/xA7+7GbYdTyVX16CzDWFp/44/DNXCzLN0W/2BdvExci
ntRWMUt5NRlA4DXgrFWW7gmeZX2LHbmQ1dl8/yksbtDxQIanUJrk7r3iRDnaZ6dk70
j7PMKqEx/YB2UO3vutuxZ4qS8+HhbGOcGbA8+Baw=
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 44F2521F8BB2 for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Wed, 7 Dec 2011 05:40:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -104.724
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No,
score=-104.724 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.725, BAYES_50=0.001,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UQPeCDO8h2IY for
<dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Dec 2011 05:40:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from stora.ogud.com (stora.ogud.com [66.92.146.20]) by
ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FE9F21F8B9C for <dnsext@ietf.org>;
Wed, 7 Dec 2011 05:40:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from work-laptop-2 (nyttbox.md.ogud.com [10.20.30.4]) by
stora.ogud.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pB7DeCY3030724;
Wed, 7 Dec 2011 08:40:14 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz)
Received: from [10.31.200.139] by work-laptop-2 (PGP Universal service);
Wed, 07 Dec 2011 08:40:15 -0500
X-PGP-Universal: processed; by work-laptop-2 on Wed, 07 Dec 2011 08:40:15 -0500
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <a06240800cb051d0f9a98@[10.31.200.139]>
In-Reply-To: <20111206221911.06FDA1925ECD@drugs.dv.isc.org>
References: <20111206221911.06FDA1925ECD@drugs.dv.isc.org>
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2011 08:40:12 -0500
To: <dnsext@ietf.org>
From: Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz>
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.72 on 10.20.30.4
Cc: ed.lewis@neustar.biz
Subject: Re: [dnsext] 3007 vs 4033, 4034 and 4035
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>,
<mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>,
<mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Sender: dnsext-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: dnsext-bounces@ietf.org
Consult this for instructions: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata.php At 9:19 +1100 12/7/11, Mark Andrews wrote: >I believe a erratra should be filed. -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Edward Lewis NeuStar You can leave a voice message at +1-571-434-5468 Vote for the word of the day: "Papa"razzi - father that constantly takes photos of the baby Corpureaucracy - The institution of corporate "red tape" _______________________________________________ dnsext mailing list dnsext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext
- [dnsext] 3007 vs 4033, 4034 and 4035 Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] 3007 vs 4033, 4034 and 4035 Edward Lewis
- Re: [dnsext] 3007 vs 4033, 4034 and 4035 Lawrence Conroy
- [dnsext] The list name (was: 3007 vs 4033, 4034 a… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [dnsext] 3007 vs 4033, 4034 and 4035 SM