Re: [dnsext] draft-diao-aip-dns

Ondřej Surý <ondrej.sury@nic.cz> Mon, 18 June 2012 13:29 UTC

Return-Path: <dnsext-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@lists.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C7A921F85E1; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 06:29:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1340026158; bh=atAKI7mPKk++H0Tdh4BSL5vGmhEwzdCgkNASW6+x5Z0=; h=Mime-Version:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Message-Id:References:To:Cc: Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help: List-Subscribe:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Sender; b=t6VxAfij6myKGQun4dYi/PAvMpoyLxsrMrCHZQzKz3ts53hgSLpfZpoyz9UUHTc4g xA7dgKOpkbv3rOg805zrNYxLq5+GSBBg7wKIFbcbbRMx1j4p/IGC9qzmp1mkDeUGdg +lkx5greuu0xhIr382D2YeDtaJdjpqUZ6+RZV8QM=
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC63721F85E1 for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 06:29:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.55
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.55 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.950, BAYES_50=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_23=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_32=0.6, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ITfh74F9rmw9 for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 06:29:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.nic.cz (mail.nic.cz [IPv6:2001:1488:800:400::400]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46DF021F85D0 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 06:29:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:1488:ac14:1400:f52d:e45c:9bff:bc58] (unknown [IPv6:2001:1488:ac14:1400:f52d:e45c:9bff:bc58]) by mail.nic.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 570B413FBBF; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 15:29:13 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nic.cz; s=default; t=1340026153; bh=SYkfKVZIk9CsAZm7XsgXSKb/YlZqsW+SygzhQ5jRTgY=; h=Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id:References:To; b=makZ6gTtoeg+aXpe0AtmKQ0Gaw+ADf8YdHuGCRzWWlx/STFZxOI4lzScZspKAjBz1 RDqQXVikwBGCAxqUAceFGiq7+URg/dXxAr66zqKTfZWl3bygkT3LmNqZOz13B3ESIe mouOczCSx9+tOx6fesCHtbZD0ls97/DkRoHJ03yY=
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278)
From: Ondřej Surý <ondrej.sury@nic.cz>
In-Reply-To: <20120618131237.GA5032@nic.fr>
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 15:29:13 +0200
Message-Id: <EEF14327-1CF4-4CB7-A380-1D1B57B2C7D4@nic.cz>
References: <alpine.LSU.2.00.1206171731130.18692@hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk> <BF001997-32AC-4221-AF0F-B529D9127EDD@nic.cz> <20120618131237.GA5032@nic.fr>
To: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278)
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.96.5 at mail
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Cc: teacherdddd@yahoo.com.cn, dnsext@ietf.org, 644247110@qq.com, diaoyp@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: [dnsext] draft-diao-aip-dns
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Sender: dnsext-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: dnsext-bounces@ietf.org

On 18. 6. 2012, at 15:12, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:

> On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 02:58:31PM +0200,
> Ond?ej Surý <ondrej.sury@nic.cz> wrote 
> a message of 35 lines which said:
> 
>> Unified DNS tree was and is an important building block of the
>> Internet and standardizing DNS-split would mean the end of the
>> Internet as we know it.
> 
> The I-D does not split the DNS at all. It plays with words by
> pretending it will allow several roots but this is not true. Instead,
> it creates a super-root (the one which will allocate the AIPs, the .A
> and .B in the examples) and therefore just displaces the (real)
> problems to the super-root.

Well, yes and no.  It's something in between.

If you are in '.A' AIP, you will not have to type .A at the end of your
query, so gov.cn will work as is without '.A'.  Only if you want to go
to 'unapproved' site in .B tree you will have to type
'encrypted.google.com.you-will-be-arrested' into your browser URL bar.

> This is what the vast majority of "several roots" systems do: create a
> new root but do not call it a root. Newspeak at its best...


Yup, I agree.

O.
--
 Ondřej Surý -- Chief Science Officer
 -------------------------------------------
 CZ.NIC, z.s.p.o.    --    Laboratoře CZ.NIC
 Americka 23, 120 00 Praha 2, Czech Republic
 mailto:ondrej.sury@nic.cz    http://nic.cz/
 tel:+420.222745110       fax:+420.222745112
 -------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
dnsext mailing list
dnsext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext