IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dnsext] draft-levine-dnsextlang-02

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Sun, 04 December 2011 16:17 UTC

Return-Path: <dnsext-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@lists.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB79221F85A1; Sun, 4 Dec 2011 08:17:55 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1323015476; bh=YTaK8r4uubzlQWwqqmOmRHS2RysKKAky5BMFoYGqpxA=; h=Mime-Version:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Message-Id:References:To:Cc: Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help: List-Subscribe:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Sender; b=zA5779WLQgTiMS/uH8W1HJK1cl9cvq4ATASebJhy+590CvbTTmh72U3z0ZMEfpyeM W9A/KxrVJFVk6EC8S5Pgpmlor4LFQrPwAH8EmZncASW/JApT9hklWUSpe1naYP69XT QZax6X7iqnbaBvJuMJFHGkFgwKYA9Eq9GfQm1Oac=
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F40D21F85A1 for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Dec 2011 08:17:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.493
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.493 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.106, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id l3e+diIooPXg for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Dec 2011 08:17:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hoffman.proper.com (IPv6.Hoffman.Proper.COM [IPv6:2605:8e00:100:41::81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 273C421F8593 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Sun, 4 Dec 2011 08:17:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.20.30.100] (50-0-66-4.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [50.0.66.4]) (authenticated bits=0) by hoffman.proper.com (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id pB4GHnS2046700 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Sun, 4 Dec 2011 09:17:50 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1251.1)
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <5CB1137F-C5EB-4D21-988F-A601C3869FD4@virtualized.org>
Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2011 08:17:49 -0800
Message-Id: <C48E30ED-3C28-4131-863C-DAA3A843FBE8@vpnc.org>
References: <20111204074710.64552.qmail@joyce.lan> <5CB1137F-C5EB-4D21-988F-A601C3869FD4@virtualized.org>
To: John Levine <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1251.1)
Cc: DNSEXT Working Group <dnsext@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dnsext] draft-levine-dnsextlang-02
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: dnsext-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: dnsext-bounces@ietf.org

On Dec 4, 2011, at 7:42 AM, David Conrad wrote:

> On Dec 3, 2011, at 11:47 PM, John Levine wrote:
>> Last month I sent in this draft which specifies an extension language
>> for DNS master files, to make it easier to define new RR types without
>> having to add new code to DNS servers every time.
>> 
>> I think I saw some interest.  Assuming dnsext shuts down, where would
>> be a reasonable place to work on it?
> 
> Well, you could hold a BOF and if there is sufficient interest, spin up a DNSLANG (or whatever) working group...


Alternately, you could just keep discussing it on this list (which Ralph said would remain alive) until Ralph thought the draft was mature enough for an Individual Submission.

There is no IETF process rule that says an out-of-charter idea needs to have any face-to-face BoF, nor any WG. In fact, the process is quite clear that the opposite is true.

--Paul Hoffman

_______________________________________________
dnsext mailing list
dnsext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email