Re: [dnsext] [dane] Aiming towards some specific wording
Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz> Tue, 22 November 2011 13:55 UTC
Return-Path: <dnsext-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@lists.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com
(Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B5D121F8D80; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 05:55:55 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1;
t=1321970155; bh=HFO06miMM8Yj5LOnU25E2Aqzr2XPpezcw3SGlZI9UM0=;
h=Mime-Version:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References:Date:To:From:Cc: Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:
List-Subscribe:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Sender;
b=eCCbKR4kti4sFFQginC1JhGIIPsF4cCBCYvEmemb4fcDyCQfhrrDRN1KEa3GILdjq
dAAoyfT8N8yXPjzu0QKHmWocvRuleZ4BfwzKYZYC0/q+deWNQ/witjX01aqR4slYde
dfVWUK8bKrKZt8WIWikZhkvvv+nWw1fwzubrd8XU=
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id B63B121F8D9A for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Tue, 22 Nov 2011 05:55:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.481
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.481 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.118,
BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id E0NaWBoYJciq for
<dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 05:55:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from stora.ogud.com (stora.ogud.com [66.92.146.20]) by
ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1002A21F8D80 for <dnsext@ietf.org>;
Tue, 22 Nov 2011 05:55:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from work-laptop-2 (nyttbox.md.ogud.com [10.20.30.4]) by
stora.ogud.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pAMDtijq008814;
Tue, 22 Nov 2011 08:55:45 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz)
Received: from [10.31.200.137] by work-laptop-2 (PGP Universal service);
Tue, 22 Nov 2011 08:55:51 -0500
X-PGP-Universal: processed; by work-laptop-2 on Tue, 22 Nov 2011 08:55:51 -0500
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <a06240800caf1560110db@[10.31.200.137]>
In-Reply-To: <20111121232055.B6D5D17DD132@drugs.dv.isc.org>
References: <45EA694E-096C-41A1-B60E-BF7B3832FE2A@vpnc.org>
<4EC70173.9090106@sv.cmu.edu> <247CAE36-68FB-4048-B07C-9B4C0903434D@vpnc.org>
<92AA2445-000C-44CF-8CA5-9796528EA946@checkpoint.com>
<0536F82C-346C-4ABE-81E6-3B008219DBD9@kirei.se>
<773BAA00-22B9-43A6-BB36-8E3CB6166E38@nic.cz>
<4B541E04-4A37-4402-AD01-EA95F69C8FB1@vpnc.org>
<6CA2C172-4BE7-479C-B305-E454B15EA9FA@nic.cz>
<20111121211312.6692917DB0E8@drugs.dv.isc.org>
<a06240803caf071b97c5c@[10.31.200.137]>
<20111121232055.B6D5D17DD132@drugs.dv.isc.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 08:55:14 -0500
To: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
From: Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz>
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.72 on 10.20.30.4
Cc: Edward Lewis <Ed.Lewis@neustar.biz>, dnsext@ietf.org,
Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Subject: Re: [dnsext] [dane] Aiming towards some specific wording
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>,
<mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>,
<mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Sender: dnsext-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: dnsext-bounces@ietf.org
Added Matt McCutchen because his post was on DANE and I'm not on that list. At 10:20 +1100 11/22/11, Mark Andrews wrote: >There are are only 3 states the data can be in. Secure, insecure and bogus. You left out "I don't know yet." But this doesn't matter, as a follow up post points out, 4033 and 4035 define indeterminate differently. -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Edward Lewis NeuStar You can leave a voice message at +1-571-434-5468 Vote for the word of the day: "Papa"razzi - father that constantly takes photos of the baby Corpureaucracy - The institution of corporate "red tape" _______________________________________________ dnsext mailing list dnsext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext
- Re: [dnsext] [dane] Aiming towards some specific … Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] [dane] Aiming towards some specific … Edward Lewis
- Re: [dnsext] [dane] Aiming towards some specific … Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] [dane] Aiming towards some specific … Paul Hoffman
- Re: [dnsext] [dane] Aiming towards some specific … Mohan Parthasarathy
- Re: [dnsext] [dane] Aiming towards some specific … Matt McCutchen
- Re: [dnsext] [dane] Aiming towards some specific … Edward Lewis
- Re: [dnsext] [dane] Aiming towards some specific … Edward Lewis
- Re: [dnsext] [dane] Aiming towards some specific … Mohan Parthasarathy