Re: [dnsext] the DNS Directorate and the end of dnsext
Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com> Mon, 05 December 2011 01:08 UTC
Return-Path: <dnsext-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@lists.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com
(Postfix) with ESMTP id 9340A21F84AA; Sun, 4 Dec 2011 17:08:26 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1;
t=1323047306; bh=xjchx9GbLzxYlxgGKN/biTo2n/QOzqYxAUZ4C9zigGk=;
h=Message-Id:From:To:In-Reply-To:Mime-Version:Date:References:Cc: Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:
List-Subscribe:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Sender;
b=kiD8AvhliQxk1EmuVgPS/B5McoqokDvcKgoMbH7c1wYjoXnhtiKA9c8vcj5jtJrmV
LvvP14S2Pl/buQdWjbJ1/+MU40x5PHULp/rKyS3kRzvKrR+9tKHwLUechiW0fIQdc1
GTrwrraHiQ+IiUOXMHUuowxdSl5TZho/ylb6cdag=
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 5E5E821F847F for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Sun, 4 Dec 2011 17:08:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vizt0yjPrv3k for
<dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Dec 2011 17:08:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from shaun.rfc1035.com (smtp.v6.rfc1035.com
[IPv6:2001:4b10:100:7::25]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id
B5DFE21F8469 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Sun, 4 Dec 2011 17:08:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gromit.rfc1035.com (gromit.rfc1035.com [195.54.233.69]) by
shaun.rfc1035.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F53DCBC44C;
Mon, 5 Dec 2011 01:08:21 +0000 (GMT)
Message-Id: <7A0435E4-C0D0-4D0B-A6C0-B2704B8AFFC3@rfc1035.com>
From: Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com>
To: bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com
In-Reply-To: <20111204232556.GA30268@vacation.karoshi.com.>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936)
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2011 01:08:20 +0000
References: <4ED94590.3090902@ogud.com> <4ED954A2.8090708@dougbarton.us>
<EEAE3014-48B5-4344-B253-7A2269447EA5@cisco.com>
<20111204055236.GB19382@vacation.karoshi.com.>
<A48F2510-A84D-461B-AA9C-8BA29B8503F0@rfc1035.com>
<20111204232556.GA30268@vacation.karoshi.com.>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936)
Cc: DNSEXT Group Working <dnsext@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dnsext] the DNS Directorate and the end of dnsext
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>,
<mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>,
<mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"; DelSp="yes"
Sender: dnsext-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: dnsext-bounces@ietf.org
On 4 Dec 2011, at 23:25, bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com wrote: > perhaps. if a directorate exists without a foundational > wg to support it What, just like pretty much all the other IETF directorates: http://www.ietf.org/iesg/directorate.html? Could dnsop serve as your "foundational wg"? If not, why not? > what you end up with is an effective censure board > that rules on proposed changes to the DNS, absent broad input > from the community. I think you're being over-dramatic. The role of the DNS Directorate is very clear. At least it is once you find its home page: http://www.ietf.org/iesg/directorate/dns.html . :-) It's a bit of a stretch to claim dnsdir constitutes an "effective censure board that rules on proposed changes to the DNS". > absent a WG, what are the rules for becoming a member of the > directorate and how is a member removed for cause? Oh. You believe the IETF is a democracy with bureacucratic procedures. I see. :-) I do agree that you have a valid point in how DNS directorate members are chosen and retired. This still has nothing to do with the winding up of dnsext IMO. > If you are comfortable w/ the IESG and the ADs making > DNS protocol choices on yur behalf, then that is your perogative. I didn't say that and I very much doubt our friends in the DNS directorate see their role like that either. Though since there's no reports on what they do/say, how could someone from the outside know? > I for one, am not and would like the ability to have/conviene > a WG to solve DNS issues -BY THE COMMUNITY- and not by a closed, > opaque body that is not accountable to that community. +1. I would expect that if the DNS Directorate was confronted with something that looked like a protocol change, they'd do The Right Thing. ie Get the Powers That Be to create and charter a new WG. > I have the answer on who, we don't have answers on succession > or accountablity By all means continue to bang that drum Bill. But please don't confuse that with the demise of dnsext. _______________________________________________ dnsext mailing list dnsext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext
- [dnsext] DNSEXT closing down soon Olafur Gudmundsson
- Re: [dnsext] DNSEXT closing down soon Doug Barton
- Re: [dnsext] DNSEXT closing down soon Jiankang Yao
- Re: [dnsext] DNSEXT closing down soon Paul Hoffman
- Re: [dnsext] DNSEXT closing down soon Edward Lewis
- Re: [dnsext] DNSEXT closing down soon Ralph Droms
- Re: [dnsext] DNSEXT closing down soon bmanning
- Re: [dnsext] DNSEXT closing down soon SM
- [dnsext] the DNS Directorate and the end of dnsext Jim Reid
- Re: [dnsext] DNSEXT closing down soon bmanning
- Re: [dnsext] the DNS Directorate and the end of d… bmanning
- Re: [dnsext] DNSEXT closing down soon SM
- Re: [dnsext] the DNS Directorate and the end of d… Jim Reid
- Re: [dnsext] the DNS Directorate and the end of d… bmanning
- Re: [dnsext] the DNS Directorate and the end of d… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [dnsext] DNSEXT closing down soon Donald Eastlake
- Re: [dnsext] DNSEXT closing down soon Jaap Akkerhuis
- Re: [dnsext] DNSEXT closing down soon Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [dnsext] DNSEXT closing down soon Masataka Ohta
- Re: [dnsext] DNSEXT closing down soon Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [dnsext] DNSEXT closing down soon SM
- Re: [dnsext] DNSEXT closing down soon bmanning
- Re: [dnsext] the DNS Directorate and the end of d… Ralph Droms
- Re: [dnsext] DNSEXT closing down soon Ralph Droms
- Re: [dnsext] DNSEXT closing down soon Edward Lewis
- Re: [dnsext] DNSEXT closing down soon Ralph Droms
- Re: [dnsext] DNSEXT closing down soon bmanning
- Re: [dnsext] the DNS Directorate and the end of d… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dnsext] the DNS Directorate and the end of d… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [dnsext] DNSEXT closing down soon Donald Eastlake
- Re: [dnsext] DNSEXT closing down soon Jiankang YAO
- Re: [dnsext] DNSEXT closing down soon Phillip Hallam-Baker
- [dnsext] disposition of draft-eastlake-dnsext-xna… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [dnsext] disposition of draft-eastlake-dnsext… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [dnsext] disposition of draft-eastlake-dnsext… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dnsext] disposition of draft-eastlake-dnsext… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [dnsext] disposition of draft-eastlake-dnsext… Murray S. Kucherawy