Re: [dnsext] draft-diao-aip-dns
Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com> Fri, 29 June 2012 15:39 UTC
Return-Path: <dnsext-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@lists.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81F2121F86F0; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 08:39:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1340984369; bh=GuTz1AC1iBF5pIR8zfymCz62NjdRWvVE64ILfAhqkyY=; h=Message-Id:From:To:In-Reply-To:Mime-Version:Date:References:Cc: Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help: List-Subscribe:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Sender; b=twuriEmIjm17PIkm/6BlTudUYe5t2k/qTSU6lOKgEKQkcCAuCsMVCUPm8cQ834W37 VrPCw+IS1OUNFWO4hsiGZpEyc227oWzWVTgvFmJa+/USjeECkE/X32MO8sKB/kJwO5 erAJfjExlpgb/QfEr+TG2q10uSg1gdQJxAdQ2XY4=
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6DA321F86F0 for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 08:39:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5VUzX75qvaQ7 for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 08:39:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shaun.rfc1035.com (smtp.v6.rfc1035.com [IPv6:2001:4b10:100:7::25]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC25921F86DE for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 08:39:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gromit.rfc1035.com (gromit.rfc1035.com [195.54.233.69]) by shaun.rfc1035.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4200CBC41C; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 16:39:26 +0100 (BST)
Message-Id: <D5132F15-4E2D-4B45-A5E3-7C7E2AFE368D@rfc1035.com>
From: Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com>
To: Ralph Droms <rdroms@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <21DEB429-D133-4C34-BFA8-F057E50977A8@cisco.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936)
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 16:39:26 +0100
References: <1340433313.43178.YahooMailClassic@web161701.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <B726DEA1-2E57-4E67-B481-5788CB26869E@vpnc.org> <CAMm+Lwh1J8+LB44X0XmUm+Fob1bSrdJLY76Vr8qsUx0yeDat+A@mail.gmail.com> <F17B354A-7D6D-4532-AA9B-8AB5D35A4BF8@rfc1035.com> <21DEB429-D133-4C34-BFA8-F057E50977A8@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936)
Cc: DNSEXT Working Group <dnsext@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dnsext] draft-diao-aip-dns
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"; DelSp="yes"
Sender: dnsext-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: dnsext-bounces@ietf.org
On 29 Jun 2012, at 16:18, Ralph Droms wrote: > Can you be more specific - why is it not technically sound and > lacking in engineering merit? Sure. The DNS uses hierarchical naming. Intrinsic to such a system is a unique root. It's the only way to ensure there's a universally consistent name space, something that's so self-evident it should not need further exposition. Any proposal for "multiple roots" by definition violate that fundamental principle. QED. It is also unclear what requirements or operating conditions lie behind this draft. So unless the WG has a better understanding of the problem the draft intends to solve, it is not known from a technical or engineering perspective if the proposed approach satisfies the preconditions that motivated the production of this draft. I suggest we ask the authors of this draft to come back when they have clarified the problem that apparently needs solving and they have devised a scheme which provides the innovation in the name space they appear to need and is consistent with RFC2826. _______________________________________________ dnsext mailing list dnsext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext
- [dnsext] draft-diao-aip-dns Tony Finch
- Re: [dnsext] draft-diao-aip-dns Ondřej Surý
- Re: [dnsext] draft-diao-aip-dns Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [dnsext] draft-diao-aip-dns Eric Brunner-Williams
- Re: [dnsext] draft-diao-aip-dns Ondřej Surý
- [dnsext] draft-diao-aip-dns Fred Baker
- Re: [dnsext] draft-diao-aip-dns Donald Eastlake
- Re: [dnsext] draft-diao-aip-dns Ralph Droms
- Re: [dnsext] draft-diao-aip-dns Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] draft-diao-aip-dns Warren Kumari
- Re: [dnsext] draft-diao-aip-dns Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [dnsext] draft-diao-aip-dns Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [dnsext] draft-diao-aip-dns Ralph Droms
- Re: [dnsext] draft-diao-aip-dns Mark Andrews
- Re: [dnsext] draft-diao-aip-dns SM
- Re: [dnsext] draft-diao-aip-dns Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [dnsext] draft-diao-aip-dns Doug Barton
- Re: [dnsext] draft-diao-aip-dns Ralph Droms
- Re: [dnsext] draft-diao-aip-dns Eric Brunner-Williams
- Re: [dnsext] draft-diao-aip-dns Jiankang YAO
- Re: [dnsext] draft-diao-aip-dns Jiankang YAO
- Re: [dnsext] draft-diao-aip-dns YP Diao
- Re: [dnsext] draft-diao-aip-dns Paul Hoffman
- Re: [dnsext] draft-diao-aip-dns Phil Regnauld
- Re: [dnsext] draft-diao-aip-dns Paul Hoffman
- Re: [dnsext] draft-diao-aip-dns Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [dnsext] draft-diao-aip-dns Dmitry Burkov
- Re: [dnsext] draft-diao-aip-dns Jim Reid
- Re: [dnsext] draft-diao-aip-dns Ralph Droms
- Re: [dnsext] draft-diao-aip-dns Nicholas Weaver
- Re: [dnsext] draft-diao-aip-dns Jim Reid
- Re: [dnsext] draft-diao-aip-dns YP Diao
- [dnsext] "knowing A root key" was Re: draft-diao-… Edward Lewis