IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dnsext] draft-mohan-dns-query-xml-00.txt

Patrik Fältström <paf@cisco.com> Fri, 30 September 2011 07:12 UTC

Return-Path: <dnsext-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@lists.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB00C21F8B9A; Fri, 30 Sep 2011 00:12:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1317366748; bh=kl1+wyDtw5uNC85L6UKuYb4Pr2sDw4koY+jeP1N374s=; h=Mime-Version:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Message-Id:References:To:Cc: Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help: List-Subscribe:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Sender; b=gBKM9IpKae3gxv10LeOYP4oYok/JPo87sLoKiqmIASib9iM9t9/7S7ZB0ai+VRwYr tt7GHaNbZzpMM9rICIauKNTBmSL3CWCrZ17IaMPWhQccullAfbkFpXVDIEuJ6Zq0M0 Mj5klpkO+2BaLRhsOBY8WdsWE6d2XG+Q4KzkoGTY=
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA0DA21F8B6B for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Sep 2011 00:12:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.288
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.288 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.011, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id w130o9PBczcc for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Sep 2011 00:12:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mtv-iport-4.cisco.com (mtv-iport-4.cisco.com [173.36.130.15]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E107621F8B66 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Sep 2011 00:12:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=paf@cisco.com; l=661; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1317366917; x=1318576517; h=subject:mime-version:from:in-reply-to:date:cc: content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=1iJVvApUBNvCRTwp9aiVbdh6a8e9rJSSsqXu07qTkMM=; b=fMOldQ0LngZCr2Al4jA4tm5Gucd8VnGMpHFiyo78ws8NUEEjgvbV0AQ/ sJOgK4ooVGueqUSXP/MweTiKFKSjOouD7utUQUgG6CU60YrpCCodoSnZf dZzDcbDbstHeaNnV294dgZiZAyOUO7ry6VtVSc0ub1UJ/o+hvVVF3QJQY U=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EACdrhU6rRDoG/2dsb2JhbABBqB53gVMBAQEBAgESASc/BQsLRlcGNYdYmXYBniqGPWEEh2+La5E+
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.68,465,1312156800"; d="scan'208";a="5165815"
Received: from mtv-core-1.cisco.com ([171.68.58.6]) by mtv-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 30 Sep 2011 07:15:17 +0000
Received: from sjc-vpn5-1614.cisco.com (sjc-vpn5-1614.cisco.com [10.21.94.78]) by mtv-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p8U7EApx015193; Fri, 30 Sep 2011 07:15:15 GMT
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1244.3)
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Patrik_F=E4ltstr=F6m?= <paf@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <0394FB3B-6C2B-4D47-B1FA-AA54B7EB1053@kirei.se>
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 09:36:11 +0300
Message-Id: <DDD7529C-9EF3-427F-AF90-2872CCD71ECF@cisco.com>
References: <CACU5sDnBx5AijEgFXKNPjtcVdtBnBJamsn-f_ye0Jm3TQq0mvw@mail.gmail.com> <0394FB3B-6C2B-4D47-B1FA-AA54B7EB1053@kirei.se>
To: Jakob Schlyter <jakob@kirei.se>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1244.3)
Cc: Paul Vixie <vixie@isc.org>, dnsext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dnsext] draft-mohan-dns-query-xml-00.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: dnsext-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: dnsext-bounces@ietf.org

On 30 sep 2011, at 00:21, Jakob Schlyter wrote:

> I would prefer a RESTful API where the response data format is dependent on the HTTP accept headers. Using such an API, one could receive various formats, e.g., XML, JSON or plain old DNS wire format. A DNS client in Javascript would probably like JSON, a libresolv-like DNS library would like wire format and someone else (although I fail to see who) might prefer XML.

+10000000

My claim/feelings/religious view is that JSON is so much better than XML when coming to the kind of usage we talk about.

So if _one_ format is to be used, please choose JSON and not XML.

   Patrik

_______________________________________________
dnsext mailing list
dnsext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email