IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dnsext] SRV prefix registry

"Everhart, Craig" <Craig.Everhart@netapp.com> Thu, 22 December 2011 13:46 UTC

Return-Path: <dnsext-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@lists.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1970621F8B0E; Thu, 22 Dec 2011 05:46:33 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1324561593; bh=mzKkEKZNlmWJV7qRdx/sL7ocFGGdH997CdksLWQLz8Q=; h=MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:From:To: Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help: List-Subscribe:Content-Type:Sender; b=irJZ/Ag+qe3LakBYeassEH0NlQu6/5bfZLHwfmwSVNZzYADDoeyxLuLInS9/MXNzb dP5yrXyYDwiVZHe7+0Z778S+PBvekY8Xjmlq4hIMVnhdko9PESkmA88ZhTv9N23JZC mahHg8AhZBsnKKv6ESQCs0giydnQbqHWC1R5vsV8=
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1C5521F8B0E for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Dec 2011 05:46:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ma7uS0do9qIz for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Dec 2011 05:46:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx2.netapp.com (mx2.netapp.com [216.240.18.37]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94BFE21F8B0C for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Dec 2011 05:46:30 -0800 (PST)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.71,393,1320652800"; d="scan'208,217"; a="609843238"
Received: from smtp2.corp.netapp.com ([10.57.159.114]) by mx2-out.netapp.com with ESMTP; 22 Dec 2011 05:46:30 -0800
Received: from sacrsexc2-prd.hq.netapp.com (sacrsexc2-prd.hq.netapp.com [10.99.115.28]) by smtp2.corp.netapp.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/NTAP-1.6) with ESMTP id pBMDkSkv020303; Thu, 22 Dec 2011 05:46:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rtprsexc2-prd.hq.netapp.com ([10.100.161.115]) by sacrsexc2-prd.hq.netapp.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 22 Dec 2011 05:46:28 -0800
Received: from RTPMVEXC2-PRD.hq.netapp.com ([10.102.76.150]) by rtprsexc2-prd.hq.netapp.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 22 Dec 2011 08:46:27 -0500
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 08:46:20 -0500
Message-ID: <0F5F2998BC888847BAAC8F8EFB91E8C401904E5F@RTPMVEXC2-PRD.hq.netapp.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMm+LwijkTrKcAL99pgzw2ULmvt-R1KG7TsRsgBmEK_QVs_CRg@mail.gmail.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [dnsext] SRV prefix registry
Thread-Index: AczArH4qXt8H7PJ0QtKqKPxyMyqe4QAA4Oow
References: <CAMm+LwijkTrKcAL99pgzw2ULmvt-R1KG7TsRsgBmEK_QVs_CRg@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Everhart, Craig" <Craig.Everhart@netapp.com>
To: "Phillip Hallam-Baker" <hallam@gmail.com>, <dnsext@ietf.org>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Dec 2011 13:46:27.0097 (UTC) FILETIME=[1A108890:01CCC0B0]
Subject: Re: [dnsext] SRV prefix registry
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0646614190097459308=="
Sender: dnsext-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: dnsext-bounces@ietf.org

Would it be over and above what's in RFC 6335?

 

From: Phillip Hallam-Baker [mailto:hallam@gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2011 8:20 AM
To: dnsext@ietf.org
Subject: [dnsext] SRV prefix registry

 

One piece of unfinished business that really should be cleared up before
DNSEXT closes is the lack of an IANA registry for SRV prefixes.

 

This is now a big problem because people have been taking maters into
their own hands. I did for SAML and XKMS. There are many thousand SRV
prefixes in use. They should be recorded 'somewhere'.

 

 

I can write up a short draft if there is interest. 

 

As a practical matter the registry will have to be 'first come first
served' for the second tier names at least. Perhaps an expert review for
proposals to introduce a new group (_tcp, _udp, _port ... ).

 

The same registry would be shared across all prefixed protocols.

 

-- 
Website: http://hallambaker.com/


_______________________________________________
dnsext mailing list
dnsext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email