Re: [dnsext] we need help to make names the same, was draft-yao-dnsext-identical-resolution-02 comment

Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> Sun, 20 February 2011 19:08 UTC

Return-Path: <dnsext-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@lists.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48C793A6D3C; Sun, 20 Feb 2011 11:08:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: dnsext@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C2863A6D3C for <dnsext@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 20 Feb 2011 11:08:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.203
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.203 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.001, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xfruNlTa4n2V for <dnsext@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 20 Feb 2011 11:08:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ppsw-41.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-41.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.141]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EFC33A6D2B for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Sun, 20 Feb 2011 11:08:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found
X-Cam-SpamDetails: not scanned
X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/
Received: from 69.91.125.91.rb4.adsl.brightview.com ([91.125.91.69]:50489 helo=[192.168.0.5]) by ppsw-41.csi.cam.ac.uk (smtp.hermes.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.156]:587) with esmtpsa (PLAIN:fanf2) (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) id 1PrEed-0001bO-RE (Exim 4.72) (return-path <fanf2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>); Sun, 20 Feb 2011 19:09:11 +0000
References: <4D5B5E81.1050602@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> <20110216073338.7251.qmail@joyce.lan> <F21692535B1A478F95D9E3AA048E8037@ics.forth.gr> <20110216165921.GW96213@shinkuro.com> <3B90ED2E-980D-4B01-889F-447D66D0B58D@insensate.co.uk> <20110216174011.GZ96213@shinkuro.com> <20110218143653.GC84482@bikeshed.isc.org> <20110218151209.GF66684@shinkuro.com> <4D5EEE09.4080405@dougbarton.us> <20110218222950.GL74065@shinkuro.com> <20110218230456.0EBCBA5028E@drugs.dv.isc.org>
In-Reply-To: <20110218230456.0EBCBA5028E@drugs.dv.isc.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 8C148)
Message-Id: <6A094DEB-AFBA-4251-8FEE-04D0F546B426@dotat.at>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (8C148)
From: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2011 19:08:51 +0000
To: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
Cc: "dnsext@ietf.org" <dnsext@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dnsext] we need help to make names the same, was draft-yao-dnsext-identical-resolution-02 comment
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: dnsext-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: dnsext-bounces@ietf.org

On 18 Feb 2011, at 23:04, Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org> wrote:
> 
> This is where SMTP is now stupid. 822 (821?) required the sender
> to rewrite in CNAME.

I think the reason for removing this feature is that it allows third parties to play silly games, inventing new aliases that will deliver mail to people without their consent.

Tony.
--
f.anthony.n.finch  <dot@dotat.at>  http://dotat.at/
_______________________________________________
dnsext mailing list
dnsext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext