Re: [dnsext] SRV prefix registry

"John R. Levine" <johnl@iecc.com> Fri, 23 December 2011 05:05 UTC

Return-Path: <dnsext-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@lists.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC4861F0C48; Thu, 22 Dec 2011 21:05:05 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1324616705; bh=7hRhpDCXsDVYiBB/xG5XqiFqiltduICDUasxpXYvy44=; h=Date:Message-ID:From:To:In-Reply-To:References:MIME-Version:Cc: Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help: List-Subscribe:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Sender; b=i7VozhCPMcdoH/u3Xa7YzrTrBfqzV52JaKgKTj+xHN4KOr/4/2YtAY4EuMSg7/Wmc +L9675Hpkt3pZZWY+KsJ0j9mtH28Ex+5aMQlS0ffCbpx492soR0YKmNRQ3WlPxrCh8 bm15JdRHZHqBeULRnhLpruySDaHlElnC+PU2+V8w=
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF25A11E80EA for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Dec 2011 21:05:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.399, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SKvvFMLX12OW for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Dec 2011 21:05:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from leila.iecc.com (leila6.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:4c:6569:6c61]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1001A11E80E8 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Dec 2011 21:05:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 76698 invoked from network); 23 Dec 2011 05:05:02 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:vbr-info:user-agent:cleverness; s=12b99.4ef40bfe.k1112; bh=qYMCntFvIK6C4wi/VTFZui5FI9A4KkWkhL4pCgwh5Hs=; b=l/uQhiCurx/YcJMNkecoGwBsSD8jTSXtQ342A8jIJWyUKfmVCJHy1shAz5rjmx4Ibg02CaZIGuA2KUgaDPYkzqwvP4siOS1E4mTGfn7SEr+ajjYzPJDsPIYm9PQs90Z9t53Nedg9j2208OPXemOWSWWj6w+U8qjb7AP12leBtOc=
VBR-Info: md=iecc.com; mc=all; mv=dwl.spamhaus.org
Received: (ofmipd 127.0.0.1) with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 23 Dec 2011 05:04:40 -0000
Date: 23 Dec 2011 00:05:01 -0500
Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1112222341400.19927@joyce.lan>
From: "John R. Levine" <johnl@iecc.com>
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com>
In-Reply-To: <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F19C6C1566D@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com>
References: <20111222221911.8008.qmail@joyce.lan> <33E4E5A5-FCA8-4918-9B74-A49F16725CD7@vpnc.org> <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F19C6C1566D@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23)
Cleverness: None detected
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "dnsext@ietf.org" <dnsext@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dnsext] SRV prefix registry
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Sender: dnsext-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: dnsext-bounces@ietf.org

>> A registry for "underscore names that have been registered" is
>> completely different. ...

> Willing to help edit/shepherd such a document if needed.

I have an old draft lying around that we can start with.

Sec 5.2 of RFC 6335 is the part that says that the service name prefixed 
by an underscore is the label that goes on a SRV record, and says that 
"the Service Label MUST be a service name as defined herein with an 
underscore prepended."

But other RFCs such as 3921, 4386, 5509, and 6186 define underscore labels 
to use as service names in SRV records, some of which don't match service 
names in the IANA service registry, so if you believe 6335, those names 
are now invalid, which probably would surprise the people using _pres and 
_im service labels.  I think they're all in other registries, so IANA 
knows about them, but they're still Service Labels.

R's,
John
_______________________________________________
dnsext mailing list
dnsext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext