IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dnsext] draft-mohan-dns-query-xml-00.txt

Wilmer van der Gaast <wilmer@google.com> Wed, 28 September 2011 22:08 UTC

Return-Path: <dnsext-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@lists.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 564881F0C81; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 15:08:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1317247692; bh=hpqrYD5VmMhF3cRGTdXfOnW3jtdrb7VxbM6OOIuil2M=; h=MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID:From:To:Cc: Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help: List-Subscribe:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Sender; b=p3vYEk8folrrufgPLtwkSiMjQGP11O0jqLIsoVEicJatHY6EXr/WsSdisc3tzzvqi PmpEYAQgSferS0RELawGccPnDlYE594+SVKaBq6m4WjS4laHQ5Q7qAqaknLwkPfEBt +uWqIj1LJR9RpQTDnp58z3cIyjqejIRkn54yEyTc=
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9951F1F0C81 for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 15:08:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KnujTNt5tJiV for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 15:08:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp-out.google.com (smtp-out.google.com [74.125.121.67]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3579B1F0C4E for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 15:08:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hpaq11.eem.corp.google.com (hpaq11.eem.corp.google.com [172.25.149.11]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id p8SMAjYn008681 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 15:10:45 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=beta; t=1317247845; bh=fIQP0YxdwNYT0uGDbflZOHBS/4Q=; h=MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID:Subject:From: To:Cc:Content-Type; b=tEw4WdQOkX89cz9N+E9G4QWGhyNuI0cQSDIJca/f7HVj6bYb5u0PWM7Jc9xf0DKwz qtUvtEt4+S0rfhXjW4JvA==
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=beta; d=google.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=dkim-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date: message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type:x-system-of-record; b=qaAvOaGtP76HoTRW5UXM+AprYT2bKbAhSQj8Wu8CWdEOGn0EfkkImcataL9G25cuU 2D3ptfL9dPa8isW7EZcsA==
Received: from iagv1 (iagv1.prod.google.com [10.12.223.1]) by hpaq11.eem.corp.google.com with ESMTP id p8SM5TPM009967 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 15:10:43 -0700
Received: by iagv1 with SMTP id v1so9935282iag.30 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 15:10:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=beta; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=LNnD6cjtNdnHtgUZP0ZD/EHx7c4uUuncmn8roGjLJjo=; b=g+qqSNb50ecdTz8AWEnAkuNpVoPMQAwnit4Zu3/+4ydSjIZnDV+WUPgv/LC6Moko4c XktQCcI9LD2B2yq0p05Q==
Received: by 10.231.28.131 with SMTP id m3mr13646875ibc.24.1317247842847; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 15:10:42 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.231.28.131 with SMTP id m3mr13646861ibc.24.1317247842502; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 15:10:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.231.35.77 with HTTP; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 15:10:42 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CACU5sDnBx5AijEgFXKNPjtcVdtBnBJamsn-f_ye0Jm3TQq0mvw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CACU5sDnBx5AijEgFXKNPjtcVdtBnBJamsn-f_ye0Jm3TQq0mvw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 15:10:42 -0700
Message-ID: <CAMbvoaK4fYg8r9JigO9gGf66EUxF-oYC5Bk5TnWmy9=zmUs-KA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Wilmer van der Gaast <wilmer@google.com>
To: Mohan Parthasarathy <suruti94@gmail.com>
X-System-Of-Record: true
Cc: Paul Vixie <vixie@isc.org>, dnsext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dnsext] draft-mohan-dns-query-xml-00.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: dnsext-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: dnsext-bounces@ietf.org

On 28 September 2011 11:24, Mohan Parthasarathy <suruti94@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Please send your comments/feedback to the list.
>
Two things off the top of my head after quickly reading this:

A) Is it necessary to hardcode the /dns_service path? IMHO it would be
nice to allow the use of base URLs instead, in case for some reason
/dns_service can't be used on a host. Also, this lets the user choose
if s/he wants to talk to a DNS service with/without DNSSEC validation
for example (or opt out from things like ISP DNS "monetisation" in a
nicer way).

B) Nit, but why not convert the booleans in responses from
<xx>value</xx> into <xx/> if it's 1 and <xx/> being absent if it's 0?


Cheers,

-- 
Wilmer van der Gaast, Traffic SRE/Google Public DNS team.
Google Ireland.
_______________________________________________
dnsext mailing list
dnsext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email