IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dnsext] we need help to make names the same, was draft-yao-dnsext-identical-resolution-02 comment

"Vaggelis Segredakis" <segred@ics.forth.gr> Thu, 17 February 2011 14:07 UTC

Return-Path: <dnsext-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@lists.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C71F43A6D16; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 06:07:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: dnsext@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16CA93A6D16 for <dnsext@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 06:07:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.101, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aMcP9lrjaN-G for <dnsext@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 06:07:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailgate.ics.forth.gr (mailgate.ics.forth.gr [139.91.1.2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FCFB3A6D12 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 06:07:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from av1.ics.forth.gr (av1-in.ics.forth.gr [139.91.1.71]) by mailgate.ics.forth.gr (8.14.3/ICS-FORTH/V10-1.8-GATE) with ESMTP id p1HE8Ege029533; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 16:08:16 +0200 (EET)
X-AuditID: 8b5b9d47-b7c88ae0000076fe-95-4d5d2bce38e9
Received: from enigma.ics.forth.gr (webmail.ics.forth.gr [139.91.1.30]) by av1.ics.forth.gr (SMTP Outbound / FORTH / ICS) with SMTP id C3.16.30462.ECB2D5D4; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 16:08:14 +0200 (EET)
Received: from Thanatos (thanatos.ics.forth.gr [139.91.88.160]) (authenticated bits=0) by enigma.ics.forth.gr (8.14.3//ICS-FORTH/V10.3.0C-EXTNULL-SSL-SASL) with ESMTP id p1HE8D0r016395 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 17 Feb 2011 16:08:13 +0200
X-ICS-AUTH-INFO: Authenticated user: segred at ics.forth.gr
From: Vaggelis Segredakis <segred@ics.forth.gr>
To: 'Masataka Ohta' <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>, dnsext@ietf.org
References: <4D5B5E81.1050602@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp><20110216073338.7251.qmail@joyce.lan><F21692535B1A478F95D9E3AA048E8037@ics.forth.gr><20110216165921.GW96213@shinkuro.com><3B90ED2E-980D-4B01-889F-447D66D0B58D@insensate.co.uk><20110216174011.GZ96213@shinkuro.com> <20110217023645.DB105A41C29@drugs.dv.isc.org><C97A678269BC4BACA04AE3FEA9BAEB69@ics.forth.gr> <4D5D119A.1070103@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 16:06:53 +0200
Message-ID: <884B191B5A40421D8B9F9933FA41CF6B@ics.forth.gr>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
Thread-Index: AcvOnLi/SjwacliXQRW5Zx9mx4VfFwADhY0A
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5994
In-Reply-To: <4D5D119A.1070103@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
X-j-chkmail-Score: MSGID : 4D5D2BCE.000 on mailgate : j-chkmail score : . : R=. U=. O=. B=0.000 -> S=0.000
X-ICS-JCHK-SCL: Ham
Subject: Re: [dnsext] we need help to make names the same, was draft-yao-dnsext-identical-resolution-02 comment
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: dnsext-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: dnsext-bounces@ietf.org

>Let your clients synchronize their domains.

That would be the easiest thing to do. However, we want to support the users
to have a good experience when using their IDN domain names and not condemn
the ones that choose an IDN over a Latin name to setup everything
two-three-four times.

Then there is the extra cost for these setups.

I believe you are familiar with the term Local Internet Community. We
respect our users need to use IDNs for the Greek characters and we want to
support in the best possible way this IDN community to expand in equal terms
to the Latin domain names. For this, we try to remove this handicap that is
present in the IDNA protocol for the non-latin users.

Best,

Vaggelis Segredakis


-----Original Message-----
From: dnsext-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:dnsext-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Masataka Ohta
Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2011 2:16 PM
To: dnsext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dnsext] we need help to make names the same, was
draft-yao-dnsext-identical-resolution-02 comment

Vaggelis Segredakis wrote:

> As a registry we provide them with the domain with tonos in
> their chosen position and the domain without it without
> extra cost. So, for every IDN registration they get two domain
> names.

Then, from the beginning, there is no problem of you at all,
even though you thought there were.

Let your clients synchronize their domains.

> For every domain containing a final
> sigma they might get four domains per registration.

If your clients will pay for the additional four domains, there
is no problem.

The problem, however, is that its not fair.

> If they are meaningless variations of the original domain they are
> not too interesting as a product.

Just say "iPod".

						Masataka Ohta
_______________________________________________
dnsext mailing list
dnsext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext

_______________________________________________
dnsext mailing list
dnsext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email