Re: [dnsext] SRV and wildcard CNAME

[Masataka Ohta <[e-mail]>]

Larry Brower wrote:

> I disagree, I say you are wasting it. Mark told you why it was a bad
> idea and you just want to argue the point.

It was already argued before Mark's first response:

> Non existent protocols are not a problem, because they just do
> not work, which is fine.
> The problem is that protocols used share a port.
> However, as the only protocol which may be used by *LAZY* users,
> other than http, is https, it may share the same port as http,
> if servers are implemented to distinguish them by the first
> byte of the request.

and, again, just after Mark's first response:

> When the protocols used at the domain are http and https only,
> nothing break.

Protocols not used at a domain can not break at the domain,
because they are not used.

But Mark *REPEATED* his unfounded statement, which is
the waste of bandwidth.

						Masataka Ohta
_______________________________________________
dnsext mailing list
[e-mail]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext