Return-Path: <owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 593493A68B2;
 Tue, 22 Jul 2008 02:00:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.924
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.924 tagged_above=-999 required=5
 tests=[AWL=-0.225, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451,
 HELO_MISMATCH_UK=1.749, J_CHICKENPOX_44=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4,
 RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32])
 by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id t4tGAQFGj32d; Tue, 22 Jul 2008 01:59:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from psg.com (psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::62])
 by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7CD33A67F4;
 Tue, 22 Jul 2008 01:59:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD))
 (envelope-from <owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org>) id 1KLDed-0008bF-Ay
 for namedroppers-data@psg.com; Tue, 22 Jul 2008 08:55:31 +0000
Received: from [213.248.199.23] (helo=mx3.nominet.org.uk)
 by psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD))
 (envelope-from <roy@nominet.org.uk>) id 1KLDeW-0008aa-H1
 for namedroppers@ops.ietf.org; Tue, 22 Jul 2008 08:55:29 +0000
DomainKey-Signature: s=main.dk.nominet.selector; d=nominet.org.uk; c=nofws;
 q=dns; 
 h=X-IronPort-AV:Received:In-Reply-To:References:To:Cc:
 Subject:MIME-Version:X-Mailer:Message-ID:From:Date:
 X-MIMETrack:Content-Type;
 b=tK1gYDTRJxdd/kvVtehQ+d5hkl87mm8sO35h1y8cea86iP7H6iMhY42S
 TlO7EZVQE/TDt2Y5xbjtMs9XHclMVcbBBKRlROOludRKm9k6x0im5xAOU
 Qz/p4gapgZn3ANc;
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple;
 d=nominet.org.uk; i=roy@nominet.org.uk; q=dns/txt;
 s=main.dkim.nominet.selector; t=1216716924; x=1248252924;
 h=from:sender:reply-to:subject:date:message-id:to:cc:
 mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-id:
 content-description:resent-date:resent-from:resent-sender:
 resent-to:resent-cc:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:
 references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:
 list-subscribe:list-post:list-owner:list-archive;
 z=From:=20"Roy=20Arends"=20<roy@nominet.org.uk>|Subject:
 =20Re:=20ignoring=20icmp=20to=20make=20dtls=20work=20for
 =20the=20stub/RDNS=20relationship|Date:=20Tue,=2022=20Jul
 =202008=2010:55:21=20+0200|Message-ID:=20<OFB1F857C8.D82B
 0A57-ON8025748E.0030A91A-C125748E.003103B3@nominet.org.uk
 >|To:=20Paul=20Vixie=20<paul@vix.com>|Cc:=20namedroppers@
 ops.ietf.org|MIME-Version:=201.0|In-Reply-To:=20<78908.12
 16715622@nsa.vix.com>|References:=20<78908.1216715622@nsa
 .vix.com>; bh=TMec/7PnmZW4eY6wgNkxdLNyABo+WHdhv+tgtBrOnQA=;
 b=lv/WRSCz+ukcbgp92CtxAaDZdH7njEfVSoxU1u5q8saJ+DowM2KXzrOX
 0IuBvrCllz7dBhYg5C4OBzq92/FJVAUhXGzoMkNnYlL5qr/0N4OHPr270
 J72xT+FQ3LE2QFz;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.31,230,1215385200"; 
   d="scan'208";a="5329555"
Received: from notes1.nominet.org.uk ([213.248.197.128])
 by mx3.nominet.org.uk with ESMTP; 22 Jul 2008 09:55:22 +0100
In-Reply-To: <78908.1216715622@nsa.vix.com>
References: <78908.1216715622@nsa.vix.com>
To: Paul Vixie <paul@vix.com>
Cc: namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
Subject: Re: ignoring icmp to make dtls work for the stub/RDNS relationship
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Build VMac_Beta85_20080115_MM2 January 15, 2008
Message-ID: <OFB1F857C8.D82B0A57-ON8025748E.0030A91A-C125748E.003103B3@nominet.org.uk>
From: "Roy Arends" <roy@nominet.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 10:55:21 +0200
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on notes1/Nominet(Release 7.0.1FP1 | May 25,
 2006) at 22/07/2008 09:55:22 AM,
 Serialize complete at 22/07/2008 09:55:22 AM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Sender: owner-namedroppers@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <namedroppers.ops.ietf.org>

Paul Vixie wrote on 07/22/2008 10:33:42 AM:

> ignoring icmp to make dtls work for the stub/RDNS relationship
> 
> i really like the simplicity of the "just use dtls" approach.  it can be
> done without a X.509 certification hierarchy, just ephemeral self-signed
> certs.  it can be done without secrecy-encryption, using the null 
cipher.
> there are libraries that implement it on several popular platforms. 
there
> is an internet draft.  it avoids all questions involving DNS payload or
> format changes.  it would be way easier to implement than TKEY+TSIG, not
> in processor cycles mind you, but in number of lines of code a DNS guy
> would have to write.

I really like the simplicity of "just running your own validating caching 
dns resolver" approach, like DRC suggested very early in a previous 
thread. 

Roy

--
to unsubscribe send a message to namedroppers-request@ops.ietf.org with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>

