Re: [dnsext] we need help to make names the same, was draft-yao-dnsext-identical-resolution-02 comment

[Patrik Fältström <[e-mail]>]

On 18 feb 2011, at 07.51, Masataka Ohta wrote:

> wrote:
> 
>> I just saw an acceptance of the by me suggested URI RR-Type, and
>> this is one of the usages I was thinking of, although it was
>> not a "main goal".
>> 
>> For example:
>> 
>> _http._tcp.example.com.  URI 1 1 http://example.hostingcompany.com/
>> _https._tcp.example.com. URI 1 1 https://example.hostingcompany.com:444/
> 
> Isn't an original request "http://example.com/filename" converted
> to "http://example.hostingcompany.com/" by URIs?

Or maybe to http://example.hostingcompany.com/filename?

And then the next question is of course what DN to compare with in the SSL cert?

And then the question is whether SRV RR should be used for example.hostingcompany.com?

I.e. what I see this discussion is boiling down to is that what I think we need is a document that clearly describe one as "simple" thing as "how to resolve a HTTP URI".

   Patrik

_______________________________________________
dnsext mailing list
[e-mail]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext