Re: [dnsext] draft-mohan-dns-query-xml-00.txt

Nicholas Weaver <nweaver@ICSI.Berkeley.EDU> Sun, 02 October 2011 11:39 UTC

Return-Path: <dnsext-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@lists.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 556C221F8E62; Sun, 2 Oct 2011 04:39:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1317555582; bh=iAo3YqjvMoU5b+nbdiXR8JnComiJJBAsEu/YfONgVfw=; h=Mime-Version:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Message-Id:References:To:Cc: Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help: List-Subscribe:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Sender; b=D253UXZCLHBckb01S9ew8FdQ62RAeXdkfsxh96rmrZuncgF4aqqEwjS4vJQGVFSnO O0ouP+0pmymv+BgKxc/1aQdLeIpc4QBtM7VCNvfDPpjqpHTXH33qvm31A3U9HcdHkb shfS3zAoauUW00zy/LGracZzPFXO+tGjsCjwlO7g=
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD42121F8E62 for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Oct 2011 04:39:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.507
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.507 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.092, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8JrLsCRu-yAi for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Oct 2011 04:39:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rock.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU (rock.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU [192.150.186.19]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9BFB21F8D8C for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Sun, 2 Oct 2011 04:39:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by rock.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FB1B2C4018; Sun, 2 Oct 2011 04:42:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ICSI.Berkeley.EDU
Received: from rock.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (maihub.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id ye5EfD8Eg82a; Sun, 2 Oct 2011 04:42:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.1.2] (c-76-103-166-40.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [76.103.166.40]) (Authenticated sender: nweaver) by rock.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU (Postfix) with ESMTP id E488D2C4002; Sun, 2 Oct 2011 04:42:37 -0700 (PDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1244.3)
From: Nicholas Weaver <nweaver@ICSI.Berkeley.EDU>
In-Reply-To: <4E87FA22.5010700@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Date: Sun, 2 Oct 2011 04:42:39 -0700
Message-Id: <54496460-643C-4ECC-BFAA-BAE3B545FFB4@ICSI.Berkeley.EDU>
References: <CACU5sDnBx5AijEgFXKNPjtcVdtBnBJamsn-f_ye0Jm3TQq0mvw@mail.gmail.com> <0394FB3B-6C2B-4D47-B1FA-AA54B7EB1053@kirei.se> <DDD7529C-9EF3-427F-AF90-2872CCD71ECF@cisco.com> <201110010458.26859.vixie@isc.org> <4E87A9C8.8090401@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> <6C66E591-5278-415B-A7A8-21AB824F2599@icsi.berkeley.edu> <4E87FA22.5010700@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
To: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1244.3)
Cc: dnsext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dnsext] draft-mohan-dns-query-xml-00.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: dnsext-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: dnsext-bounces@ietf.org

On Oct 1, 2011, at 10:44 PM, Masataka Ohta wrote:

> Nicholas Weaver wrote:
> 
>> a)  Google's privacy policy is clear on what data they
>> keep and discard from Public DNS.
> 
> That's not the point. See client subnet thread.

Oh, THAT particular weird meme, which makes no sense either since:

a)  Client subnet doesn't send IP, only subnet

b)  It sends this information to the DNS authority representing the domain the user is going to contact anyway.


_______________________________________________
dnsext mailing list
dnsext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext