IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dnsext] DNSEXT closing down soon

SM <sm@resistor.net> Mon, 05 December 2011 15:07 UTC

Return-Path: <dnsext-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@lists.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-namedroppers-archive-gleetwall6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43EC621F8B70; Mon, 5 Dec 2011 07:07:56 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1323097676; bh=GOrv2K2Xq5qgPNtbkuBPbXVnJr+Gz1TBvMKdOyudM0E=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:In-Reply-To:References:Mime-Version: Subject:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help: List-Subscribe:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Sender; b=vw5eMEke+sJtKt00JvrViG1mDKzotIZaJSpzAVcNSl0yelATWE7BI0rYAUmdMpnrw KD9F2/cmvpbYyBHQY9RWB2ZTcwbx2a1s5p3h9aX02VVC3bTNgcKrbAgUeB2JY8B0Ls Fgl6yYwO2JHJ07QgFRvIEEwK2oE0mqdUXstgOA8M=
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 472F621F8B70 for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Dec 2011 07:07:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6d9l0vA8O80T for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Dec 2011 07:07:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4024C21F8B50 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Dec 2011 07:07:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from SUBMAN.resistor.net (IDENT:sm@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.4/8.14.5) with ESMTP id pB5F7f65024365 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Dec 2011 07:07:48 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1323097669; bh=1Eh92tVYMyWLwsDreC0PVhKlGq8500OZh4fafT1QJ/A=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type:Cc; b=QoQEJiwETF/Uo3RNtFPHo0SEXrKaYgkuxvB/w26TiYOBIf8tP2xkXA+DO4Rnjq147 XCLUe7cE4Uokwp3BffhxG39yCaATW/hdB7/N1X8JpVurg1XQaanl7WdHjIoUIKKrmm kyE9O0rMw4e1bztOCN2Y1X8q0zLT/0XKK38Ayx+c=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=resistor.net; s=mail; t=1323097669; bh=1Eh92tVYMyWLwsDreC0PVhKlGq8500OZh4fafT1QJ/A=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type:Cc; b=y1m4QeIHi6zaSNk8chRTcoDmyubKr7/xHts7W5yLOL7+vNV3ativ5EkNEJw2J6qvV UbvnmNig8gg/ePCqD0U42TDINOzYznZv4S/P1PLxynl/nYcjIxC6xEMaUFU1WRwXxS RlIAkvaYE92bm/CGZ6wE88CAagzPWk224bTxf5E8=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20111205060349.0642ff68@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2011 06:42:52 -0800
To: dnsext@ietf.org
From: SM <sm@resistor.net>
In-Reply-To: <20111205123652.GE84440@shinkuro.com>
References: <4ED94590.3090902@ogud.com> <4ED954A2.8090708@dougbarton.us> <002301ccb1bc$d6c84980$ca01a8c0@computer> <7E643BE4-8E59-4C1A-B8EC-7EC430DD2A51@vpnc.org> <a06240801cb001060e91a@[192.168.128.223]> <20111205123652.GE84440@shinkuro.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [dnsext] DNSEXT closing down soon
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Sender: dnsext-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: dnsext-bounces@ietf.org

At 04:36 05-12-2011, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
>Speaking only personally, I think the above two observations by Ed are
>the key: the WG has not worked very hard to complete documents that

As a data point:

  draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-registry-fixes-00   Oct 2009
  draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2672bis-dname-00        Sep 2006
  draft-ietf-dnsext-5395bis-00                 Nov 2010 (published Mar 2011)
  draft-ietf-dnsext-axfr-clarify-00            Mar 2000 (published Jun 2010)
  draft-ietf-dnsext-dns-tcp-requirements-00    Oct 2009 (published Aug 2010)
  draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-alg-allocation-00   Sep 2009 (published Nov 2010)
  draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-gost-00             Sep 2009 (published Jul 2010)
  draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-bis-updates-00      May 2005
  draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-algo-signal-00      Nov 2010
  draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2671bis-edns0-00        Dec 2007

And for DNSOP:

  draft-ietf-dnsop-as112-ops-00                      Feb 2007 
(published Jul 2011)
  draft-ietf-dnsop-as112-under-attack-help-help-00   Feb 2007 
(published Jul 2011)
  draft-ietf-dnsop-default-local-zones-00            Jul 2006 
(published Jul 2011)
  draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-dps-framework-00           Nov 2009
  draft-ietf-dnsop-respsize-00                       Jun 2003
  draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc4641bis-00                     Mar 2009

Regards,
-sm 

_______________________________________________
dnsext mailing list
dnsext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email