[nasr] Re: Discussion on overlap with other WG/RGs
"Liuchunchi(Peter)" <liuchunchi@huawei.com> Sun, 20 October 2024 11:22 UTC
Return-Path: <liuchunchi@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: nasr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nasr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A5D9C14F609 for <nasr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 20 Oct 2024 04:22:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.906
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.906 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id z48oEDroajvC for <nasr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 20 Oct 2024 04:22:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 96C96C14F5EA for <nasr@ietf.org>; Sun, 20 Oct 2024 04:22:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.18.186.231]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4XWbcp4c31z6K5q5 for <nasr@ietf.org>; Sun, 20 Oct 2024 19:22:02 +0800 (CST)
Received: from lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.191.163.240]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E39CE140736 for <nasr@ietf.org>; Sun, 20 Oct 2024 19:22:51 +0800 (CST)
Received: from dggpeml100017.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.161) by lhrpeml500005.china.huawei.com (7.191.163.240) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.39; Sun, 20 Oct 2024 12:22:51 +0100
Received: from dggpeml100018.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.133) by dggpeml100017.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.161) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.1.2507.39; Sun, 20 Oct 2024 19:22:49 +0800
Received: from dggpeml100018.china.huawei.com ([7.185.36.133]) by dggpeml100018.china.huawei.com ([7.185.36.133]) with mapi id 15.01.2507.039; Sun, 20 Oct 2024 19:22:49 +0800
From: "Liuchunchi(Peter)" <liuchunchi@huawei.com>
To: Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net>, nasr <nasr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [nasr] Discussion on overlap with other WG/RGs
Thread-Index: AQHbH8Ul/5Fy2YaTE0aeGJkovsXlcLKPhKow
Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2024 11:22:49 +0000
Message-ID: <8253a87ed5d04497b630b6313749608f@huawei.com>
References: <21CBBBFE-5D00-4A18-83FE-D67DFEFAA374@gigix.net>
In-Reply-To: <21CBBBFE-5D00-4A18-83FE-D67DFEFAA374@gigix.net>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.136.114.71]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID-Hash: DJ4GEEIJC556MXSOT4UACYBJZU6NSD5M
X-Message-ID-Hash: DJ4GEEIJC556MXSOT4UACYBJZU6NSD5M
X-MailFrom: liuchunchi@huawei.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [nasr] Re: Discussion on overlap with other WG/RGs
List-Id: Network Attestation for Secure Routing <nasr.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nasr/NIl4SIQTwMQmcsLFoOYfI-kWSsE>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nasr>
List-Help: <mailto:nasr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:nasr-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:nasr@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:nasr-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:nasr-leave@ietf.org>
Hi Luigi, I think PANRG might be a good place (and maybe necessary) to speak in, per the requests collected from last BOF. I am happy to help request a slot there if needed . > -----Original Message----- > From: Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net> > Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2024 8:15 PM > To: nasr <nasr@ietf.org> > Subject: [nasr] Discussion on overlap with other WG/RGs > > Hi All, > > I I summarized in the slides, NASR has some relationship with RATS, SAVNET, > PANRG, ANIMA. > > - We alrerady agreed with the chairs of SAVNET on a text highlighting the > differences. SO I do not think we need any further action. > - We already presented in RATS, and while it is certainly a good idea to keep > them updated, I am not sure whether we need an update this time. > - For PANRG, I contact the chairs at last IETF, but did not receive any reply. I > am happy to ask for a 10 minutes slot to give a smal glimpse of what NASR is > about. > - For ANIMA, would be good have a 10 minutes slot there to present the main > idea of NASR. > > I can prepare the slides for the two slots (PANRG and ANIMA), but I was > wondering if anybody more familiar with ANIMA wants to present? > > And finally.. does anybody see any other WG/RG we should reach out to? > > Ciao > > L. > -- > nasr mailing list -- nasr@ietf.org > To unsubscribe send an email to nasr-leave@ietf.org
- [nasr] Discussion on overlap with other WG/RGs Luigi Iannone
- [nasr] Re: Discussion on overlap with other WG/RGs Liuchunchi(Peter)
- [nasr] Re: Discussion on overlap with other WG/RGs Luigi IANNONE